That's a meaningless stat. Many of the teams on that list are ineffective offensively. They did okay against Barnesville, but there's lots of room to improve.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:26 pmGood Call buddyCats claw wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:46 pmFort frye struggles with pass defense, if fort frye turns the ball over a few times and shendoah hits a few big plays it might be close that being said game at Beverly. Cal preps has cadets by 18 I doubt it will be that closeEasternDspy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 11:44 am
Last year Shenandoah was better and Fort ran for 300 on them. That being said Shenandoah has by far the biggest line and best line will face all reg season.
Pass Yards allowed by Week
Caldwell 4
Barnesville 110 on (7-23)
Frontier 39
Monroe Central 47
Waterford 191 (11-21)
Belpre 0
Northridge 17
Total of 336
48 passing yards allowed per week
Fort Frye 31 Shenandoah 12
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:15 am
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 5077
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: NORTH OF EDEN
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:44 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Zeps by 6. Don’t go by records. Zeps been banged up and their Coaching staff far more superior!
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Haha yea right.Notachance wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:47 pm Zeps by 6. Don’t go by records. Zeps been banged up and their Coaching staff far more superior!
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Jesse WellsNotachance wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:47 pm Zeps by 6. Don’t go by records. Zeps been banged up and their Coaching staff far more superior!
Shenandoah
2015
(4-6)
L- Fort Frye (41-14)
2016
(4-6)
L- @ Fort Frye (31-8)
2017
(8-3)
Playoffs
L- Fort Frye (26-8)
2018
(4-4)
Total - (20-19) Record (0-3) vs Fort Frye
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Coach Eric HuckNotachance wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:47 pm Zeps by 6. Don’t go by records. Zeps been banged up and their Coaching staff far more superior!
2008- (3-7)
L Shenandoah (13-48)
2009 - (6-4)
L- @ Shenandoah (6-7)
2010- (7-3)
W- Shenandoah (26-25)
2011 (5-5)
L- @ Shenandoah (45-0)
2012 (8-3)
State playoffs
PVC Champs
W- Shenandoah (60-14)
2013 (8-3)
State Playoffs
W- @Shenandoah (35-7)
2014 (7-3)
W- Shenandoah (42-29)
2015 (10-1)
State Playoffs
PVC Champs
W- @ Shenandoah (41-14)
2016 (12-1)
State Playoffs
PVC Champs
First team in Washington County to win Playoff game
W- Shenandoah (31-8)
2017 ( 10-2)
State Playoffs
PVC Champs
Playoff win
W- @Shenandoah (26-8)
2018- (7-0)
Total - 83- 32
4- PVC Titles
5- Playoff appearances
3- Playoff wins
(7-3) vs Shenandoah
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
I can't disagree with the part about records. The Zeps played a tougher schedule. I think they are solid.Notachance wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:47 pm Zeps by 6. Don’t go by records. Zeps been banged up and their Coaching staff far more superior!
But how do you say the coaching staff is far superior?
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
efarns wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:50 pmI can't disagree with the part about records. The Zeps played a tougher schedule. I think they are solid.Notachance wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:47 pm Zeps by 6. Don’t go by records. Zeps been banged up and their Coaching staff far more superior!
But how do you say the coaching staff is far superior?
What does playing a better schedule have to do with anything the 3 good teams they played beat them solidly. Beaver Local might be a bigger school but they are (3-5) and historically bad.
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
FF by 14 +. The Zeps glass slipper is about to fall off.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Fort Frye has won 18 league games in row dating back to 2014.
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Fort Frye is far too talented on both sides of the ball to lose this one. Cadets by atleast +14.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 1:57 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
No running clock in this one but the Cadets win by 17+
Good luck and good health to both teams.
Good luck and good health to both teams.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Which Shenandoah team shows up? Single Wing control the clock or Speed Shotgun team. I think to be successful they need to grind it out. I’ll take Fort Lbs on the outside anyday.
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Against Fort Frye's schedule, The Zeps would be, at worst, 7-1. The records are deceiving. I think The Cadets have more depth, and their coaching is going to find ways to take advantage of that. I favor Fort Frye by 10. However, unlike, say, Federal Hocking, with the right breaks, Shenandoah is perfectly capable of winning this game.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:23 pmefarns wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:50 pmI can't disagree with the part about records. The Zeps played a tougher schedule. I think they are solid.Notachance wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:47 pm Zeps by 6. Don’t go by records. Zeps been banged up and their Coaching staff far more superior!
But how do you say the coaching staff is far superior?
What does playing a better schedule have to do with anything the 3 good teams they played beat them solidly. Beaver Local might be a bigger school but they are (3-5) and historically bad.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
That doesn’t mean they are good Fort has played a pretty bad schedule most games over by halftime.efarns wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:09 pmAgainst Fort Frye's schedule, The Zeps would be, at worst, 7-1. The records are deceiving. I think The Cadets have more depth, and their coaching is going to find ways to take advantage of that. I favor Fort Frye by 10. However, unlike, say, Federal Hocking, with the right breaks, Shenandoah is perfectly capable of winning this game.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:23 pm
What does playing a better schedule have to do with anything the 3 good teams they played beat them solidly. Beaver Local might be a bigger school but they are (3-5) and historically bad.
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Since 2008. Fort Frye is 15-26 against teams above .500. 68-6 against teams below .500 including playoffs
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Vs .500 or better
2015
4-0 Reg Season
0-1 Playoffs
2016
2-0 Reg Season
2-1 Playoffs
2017
4-1 Reg Season
1-1 Playoffs
2018
3-0
16-4
Better fact check homie that’s just since 2015
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Really reaching going back to the first few years when he was coaching. Since building the program they’ve been pretty fire vs teams .500 or better
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18281
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 9: Shenandoah (4-4) @ Fort Frye (7-0) PVC Title Game
Coach Huck 11-0 vs Waterford and has more playoff wins then any coach ever in Washington County.