The future of grass fields

Post Reply
User avatar
eagles73Taylor
SE
Posts: 2479
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:18 pm
Location: Piketon, Ohio

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by eagles73Taylor »

Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying you’re wrong, just going by what I have heard also. Would love for it to happen this year as well.


toast
All State
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:10 am

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by toast »

eagles73Taylor wrote: Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:03 pm Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying you’re wrong, just going by what I have heard also. Would love for it to happen this year as well.
Let me know if it happens before next season. I want to come down and check it out and get a few pictures. Exciting for sure :)


bfry
JV Team
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:24 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by bfry »

Process has begun at Northwest. Old concession torn down.
CE109442-B498-4486-A9EE-8C5BD9EA442A.jpeg


ravensfan09
JV Team
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:29 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by ravensfan09 »

Will Gallia ever make the transition to turf? Fairland?


State7
Waterboy
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:41 am

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by State7 »

Any schools getting turf in the coming years? Or in the talks. Piketon? Unioto? West? Be neat to see those teams look into it!


mlittle
SEOP
Posts: 4230
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 1:56 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by mlittle »

toast wrote: Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:37 pm
eagles73Taylor wrote: Thu Dec 20, 2018 8:41 am Toast, I will be pleasantly surprised if that happens that soon at Piketon. That’s only 7 months away, now in the near future I think it will be done, plus other athletic and the arts upgrades! You can’t go wrong with permanent improvements to a school.
I kinda thought they were hoping to have turf by next season. But you would have a better idea on that than I would. It will be a nice upgrade that most are looking forward to.
Love to see Piketon get turf by next season


NW Phoenix
Waterboy
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:56 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by NW Phoenix »



Sykotyk
Waterboy
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:40 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by Sykotyk »

Ferndale Yellow Jackets (PA) hosting Purchase Line Red Dragons (PA) at Ferndale Stadium in Ferndale. (Week 10 this past year).

You don't see games like this that much anymore.

More pics available from that week here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sykotyk/a ... 2969478605

Photos from that game start on Page 2: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sykotyk/a ... 8605/page2

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Sykotyk
Waterboy
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:40 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by Sykotyk »

Image

Image

Image

Image


4thgoal
SEOPS
Posts: 6436
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Wheelersburg

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by 4thgoal »

From my understanding, if schools set aside the same amount of money they spend for maintaining the field (labor, fuel, gas, mower maintenance, fertilizer, seed, water, paint, etc) they can easily afford the replacement of turf after its 10 year life. The major issue is the initial investment, but if you can get to that point, the turf basically pays for itself. I have heard the turf at Burg has already paid for itself after 7 seasons.


ravensfan09
JV Team
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:29 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by ravensfan09 »

4thgoal wrote: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:58 am From my understanding, if schools set aside the same amount of money they spend for maintaining the field (labor, fuel, gas, mower maintenance, fertilizer, seed, water, paint, etc) they can easily afford the replacement of turf after its 10 year life. The major issue is the initial investment, but if you can get to that point, the turf basically pays for itself. I have heard the turf at Burg has already paid for itself after 7 seasons.
Thats interesting. I just saw where Massillon Washington is replacing their turf and it is costing over $400,000.

That would mean to have a turf field and it pay for itself in 7 year, schools would be spending an averages or over $57,000 per year on their grass fields. That would be an amazing study.


Dundas
SEOPS
Posts: 5454
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:11 pm
Location: McArthur

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by Dundas »

ravensfan09 wrote: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:57 pm
4thgoal wrote: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:58 am From my understanding, if schools set aside the same amount of money they spend for maintaining the field (labor, fuel, gas, mower maintenance, fertilizer, seed, water, paint, etc) they can easily afford the replacement of turf after its 10 year life. The major issue is the initial investment, but if you can get to that point, the turf basically pays for itself. I have heard the turf at Burg has already paid for itself after 7 seasons.
Thats interesting. I just saw where Massillon Washington is replacing their turf and it is costing over $400,000.

That would mean to have a turf field and it pay for itself in 7 year, schools would be spending an averages or over $57,000 per year on their grass fields. That would be an amazing study.
I’m not sure what the upkeep is at VC for our field but I would be pretty comfortable saying that it’s is nowhere near 57k a year. Lol maybe 3-4K? Maybe...


ravensfan09
JV Team
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:29 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by ravensfan09 »

Dundas wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:02 am
ravensfan09 wrote: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:57 pm
4thgoal wrote: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:58 am From my understanding, if schools set aside the same amount of money they spend for maintaining the field (labor, fuel, gas, mower maintenance, fertilizer, seed, water, paint, etc) they can easily afford the replacement of turf after its 10 year life. The major issue is the initial investment, but if you can get to that point, the turf basically pays for itself. I have heard the turf at Burg has already paid for itself after 7 seasons.
Thats interesting. I just saw where Massillon Washington is replacing their turf and it is costing over $400,000.

That would mean to have a turf field and it pay for itself in 7 year, schools would be spending an averages or over $57,000 per year on their grass fields. That would be an amazing study.
I’m not sure what the upkeep is at VC for our field but I would be pretty comfortable saying that it’s is nowhere near 57k a year. Lol maybe 3-4K? Maybe...
Thats what I would say....at most 10-15,000. Most schools couldn't afford $57,000 a year for field maintenance.


Sykotyk
Waterboy
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:40 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by Sykotyk »

ravensfan09 wrote: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:57 pm
4thgoal wrote: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:58 am From my understanding, if schools set aside the same amount of money they spend for maintaining the field (labor, fuel, gas, mower maintenance, fertilizer, seed, water, paint, etc) they can easily afford the replacement of turf after its 10 year life. The major issue is the initial investment, but if you can get to that point, the turf basically pays for itself. I have heard the turf at Burg has already paid for itself after 7 seasons.
Thats interesting. I just saw where Massillon Washington is replacing their turf and it is costing over $400,000.

That would mean to have a turf field and it pay for itself in 7 year, schools would be spending an averages or over $57,000 per year on their grass fields. That would be an amazing study.
I wouldn't judge expenses on what Massillon does. They're not going to nickel and dime themselves or their booster club. If they want new turf, they're buying new turf. Whether it's due or not. They're also not going cheap.

A big part of the expense is what type of pattern or design you want. Everything is cut and sewn together. It's not painted. The more endzone or midfield designs you have, the more it costs. Massillon also had the old concrete turf for the longest time, I'm sure it's not as simple as the new turf field that convert from grass to the sand base for the turf.

Also, there is different types of turf with different ages, uses, etc. My HS basically existed where a swamp once was and the grass was always turning to mud. Turf switch over cost $600k. Replacement after ten years is listed at $300k.

As mentioned elsewhere, you also have to account for the fact you can use your primary stadium for so much more with turf. And you don't need to maintain other grass fields for games and practices as much or at all.

Also, the $40k/year maintenance for a grass field is if you a) count the mower as just exclusive for the field, while most schools mow their field with the same mower that handles the rest of the school grounds, b) actually keep it in great shape (most schools are woefully inadequate) and c) paint it well, which again most high schools don't.

Image

Image

Big difference.


ravensfan09
JV Team
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:29 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by ravensfan09 »

Sykotyk wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:35 am
ravensfan09 wrote: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:57 pm
4thgoal wrote: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:58 am From my understanding, if schools set aside the same amount of money they spend for maintaining the field (labor, fuel, gas, mower maintenance, fertilizer, seed, water, paint, etc) they can easily afford the replacement of turf after its 10 year life. The major issue is the initial investment, but if you can get to that point, the turf basically pays for itself. I have heard the turf at Burg has already paid for itself after 7 seasons.
Thats interesting. I just saw where Massillon Washington is replacing their turf and it is costing over $400,000.

That would mean to have a turf field and it pay for itself in 7 year, schools would be spending an averages or over $57,000 per year on their grass fields. That would be an amazing study.
I wouldn't judge expenses on what Massillon does. They're not going to nickel and dime themselves or their booster club. If they want new turf, they're buying new turf. Whether it's due or not. They're also not going cheap.

A big part of the expense is what type of pattern or design you want. Everything is cut and sewn together. It's not painted. The more endzone or midfield designs you have, the more it costs. Massillon also had the old concrete turf for the longest time, I'm sure it's not as simple as the new turf field that convert from grass to the sand base for the turf.

Also, there is different types of turf with different ages, uses, etc. My HS basically existed where a swamp once was and the grass was always turning to mud. Turf switch over cost $600k. Replacement after ten years is listed at $300k.

As mentioned elsewhere, you also have to account for the fact you can use your primary stadium for so much more with turf. And you don't need to maintain other grass fields for games and practices as much or at all.

Also, the $40k/year maintenance for a grass field is if you a) count the mower as just exclusive for the field, while most schools mow their field with the same mower that handles the rest of the school grounds, b) actually keep it in great shape (most schools are woefully inadequate) and c) paint it well, which again most high schools don't.

Image

Image

Big difference.
I get it that you can't judge off of Massillon, but still the numbers just dont add up. I wonder how mant MAC schools have turf? Coldwater? Marion Local? Fort Recovery? Saint Henry?


User avatar
one Oak
JV Team
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 9:26 pm
Location: Oak Hill, Ohio

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by one Oak »

It looks like Ferndale doesn't have lights either.


Sykotyk
Waterboy
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:40 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by Sykotyk »

one Oak wrote: Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:22 pm It looks like Ferndale doesn't have lights either.
Nope. Johnstown is an interesting city.

Inside most of the city, is "Greater Johnstown". The school is on the southside of the city. Ferndale is just east/southeast of the high school. Stadium is also right on the river. To the west GJ, up on top of the hill is Westmont Hilltop (they're not that creative in names). To the east/southeast of town, is Richland, but it's a bit ways out, and is a rather well off area. To the north is Connemaugh Valley, a poor, rural area skirting the north of the city. WH, Ferndale, CV, and GJ all have Johnstown addresses, though technically the three surrounding schools are outside the city limits. But their districts meander everywhere.

Westy (as they're called), Ferndale, and CV are all very small schools with unlit grass fields. Ferndale is a baseball/football hybride (football field is aligned down the left field line, with the endzone cutting into about the pitchers mound). Richland has turf and really nice. GJ has turf and a huge stadium.

The area really only needs 2, maybe 3 schools. But, that's not how PA rolls.


ravensfan09
JV Team
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:29 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by ravensfan09 »

BigBlueNation wrote: Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:17 am Northwest will be getting turf this off season. I think the turf company is going to wait until spring to start on the field.
The athletic facility will be started in the next few weeks.
This building will house weight room, locker rooms for football ,soccer and cross country. There will also be 30 yards of indoor turf along with batting cages in this building.
Its so wet...it would be great if they did wait. Spending that much money...you want everything to be perfect. It might take a little longer, but time should not be a factor here.


king kong
Freshman Team
Posts: 230
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:57 am

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by king kong »

toast wrote: Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:37 pm
eagles73Taylor wrote: Thu Dec 20, 2018 8:41 am Toast, I will be pleasantly surprised if that happens that soon at Piketon. That’s only 7 months away, now in the near future I think it will be done, plus other athletic and the arts upgrades! You can’t go wrong with permanent improvements to a school.
I kinda thought they were hoping to have turf by next season. But you would have a better idea on that than I would. It will be a nice upgrade that most are looking forward to.
It appears this will be the case, looking at installed a ready for home opener this season. Exciting times here in Piketon.


ravensfan09
JV Team
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:29 pm

Re: The future of grass fields

Post by ravensfan09 »

king kong wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 1:36 pm
toast wrote: Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:37 pm
eagles73Taylor wrote: Thu Dec 20, 2018 8:41 am Toast, I will be pleasantly surprised if that happens that soon at Piketon. That’s only 7 months away, now in the near future I think it will be done, plus other athletic and the arts upgrades! You can’t go wrong with permanent improvements to a school.
I kinda thought they were hoping to have turf by next season. But you would have a better idea on that than I would. It will be a nice upgrade that most are looking forward to.
It appears this will be the case, looking at installed a ready for home opener this season. Exciting times here in Piketon.
Great news for Piketon High School!! I heard it would be ready by the first home game, providing this rain stops.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”