Page 2 of 2

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:51 pm
by Raiderball
FANOSPORTS wrote: Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:34 pm
Raiderball wrote: Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:01 am
FANOSPORTS wrote: Tue Jan 15, 2019 4:13 pm

Is the General really gone or is he just lying in wait till next year ?
gone
So much for self expression and having an opinion against the Big-10. WOW. I didn't know a prerequisite was being a Big-10 fan only. I might get tossed myself then but if I do, I do.
That's the way it seems. One way to silence the critics I guess.

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 8:16 pm
by Bleeding Red
Raiderball wrote: Mon Jan 14, 2019 5:05 pm Ole red finding someone else to argue with after he cried to mods and had the General banished. Need an ignore button on here so you can hide some peoples ramblings.
Oh it's my fault he acted like an idiot? Lol. Get a life dude.

Are you the next to crack under the pressure?

Glad General is gone. He is a disease and broke rules. Bye Felicia.

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:54 pm
by Raiderball
Because he didn't worship osu and urban? He posted facts that you didn't like? That you didn't want to hear?

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:31 am
by Chieftain2009
Raiderball wrote: Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:54 pm Because he didn't worship osu and urban? He posted facts that you didn't like? That you didn't want to hear?
I have no idea whether he was kicked off the site (but reading through here it sounds like he was). He definitely kept things interesting. But, he only posted facts about half the time, the other half was him bashing people for being OSU fans, or bashing anything Big Ten, or name calling (although he was not the only one doing that).

I would assume he was warned before being kicked off, but I have no idea how that works.

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:30 pm
by Raiderball
Chieftain2009 wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:31 am
Raiderball wrote: Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:54 pm Because he didn't worship osu and urban? He posted facts that you didn't like? That you didn't want to hear?
I have no idea whether he was kicked off the site (but reading through here it sounds like he was). He definitely kept things interesting. But, he only posted facts about half the time, the other half was him bashing people for being OSU fans, or bashing anything Big Ten, or name calling (although he was not the only one doing that).

I would assume he was warned before being kicked off, but I have no idea how that works.
Saw many positive posts from him on Brohm at Purdue and Frost at Nebraska. If you want to call pointing out the lack of passing attack by Wisc, NW, Sparty... then ok but from the stats I saw they deserved bashing. 7-26 and less than 100 yds? LOL

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:50 pm
by OHHS old timer
To be honest...I never was a fan of "three yards and a cloud of dust" back when I was growing up in Oak Hill. I actually really liked Bobby Bowden at WVU...he threw the ball deep.

However....he couldn't beat Penn St. or Pitt...FSU wanted him and......the rest is history. Been a Nole fan since '79.

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:52 am
by Bleeding Red
Raiderball wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:30 pm
Chieftain2009 wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:31 am
Raiderball wrote: Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:54 pm Because he didn't worship osu and urban? He posted facts that you didn't like? That you didn't want to hear?
I have no idea whether he was kicked off the site (but reading through here it sounds like he was). He definitely kept things interesting. But, he only posted facts about half the time, the other half was him bashing people for being OSU fans, or bashing anything Big Ten, or name calling (although he was not the only one doing that).

I would assume he was warned before being kicked off, but I have no idea how that works.
Saw many positive posts from him on Brohm at Purdue and Frost at Nebraska. If you want to call pointing out the lack of passing attack by Wisc, NW, Sparty... then ok but from the stats I saw they deserved bashing. 7-26 and less than 100 yds? LOL
I saw very little positive posts about anything other than the SEC from him. When you come on to an Ohio based site that has primarily Ohio based fans and constantly bash the most popular team on that site AND their fan base, you get what is coming to you.

If he is was so stupid as to get warnings and continue to do it, good for the mods for getting rid of him. Good riddance.

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:38 pm
by FANOSPORTS
It's just sports banter and who really cares about what someone else thinks in the whole scheme of things. In reality the only major Big Ten men's sport that scares the bejesus out of people from other conferences is Wrestling where they have 34 national titles the last 50 years (Iowa-23,Penn St 7,Minn-3 ,OSU 1). In that same timeframe the B10 has 0 baseball titles, 5 football titles (OSU-3 outright & 1 shared and Michigan 1 shared) and 6 basketball titles (IND 3,MSU 2, MICH 1) with the last of those being 30 years ago. If you set aside Wrestling the B10 is well below the other major conferences in major sport championships over the last half century. Anyway, just my rant today for 1st amendment rights on SEOPS and may everyone have a great day.

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:58 pm
by Raiderball
Bleeding Red wrote: Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:52 am
Raiderball wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:30 pm
Chieftain2009 wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:31 am

I have no idea whether he was kicked off the site (but reading through here it sounds like he was). He definitely kept things interesting. But, he only posted facts about half the time, the other half was him bashing people for being OSU fans, or bashing anything Big Ten, or name calling (although he was not the only one doing that).

I would assume he was warned before being kicked off, but I have no idea how that works.
Saw many positive posts from him on Brohm at Purdue and Frost at Nebraska. If you want to call pointing out the lack of passing attack by Wisc, NW, Sparty... then ok but from the stats I saw they deserved bashing. 7-26 and less than 100 yds? LOL
I saw very little positive posts about anything other than the SEC from him. When you come on to an Ohio based site that has primarily Ohio based fans and constantly bash the most popular team on that site AND their fan base, you get what is coming to you.

If he is was so stupid as to get warnings and continue to do it, good for the mods for getting rid of him. Good riddance.
So anyone with a difference of opinion we just ban them from the site? LOL what a joke. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:59 pm
by Raiderball
FANOSPORTS wrote: Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:38 pm It's just sports banter and who really cares about what someone else thinks in the whole scheme of things. In reality the only major Big Ten men's sport that scares the bejesus out of people from other conferences is Wrestling where they have 34 national titles the last 50 years (Iowa-23,Penn St 7,Minn-3 ,OSU 1). In that same timeframe the B10 has 0 baseball titles, 5 football titles (OSU-3 outright & 1 shared and Michigan 1 shared) and 6 basketball titles (IND 3,MSU 2, MICH 1) with the last of those being 30 years ago. If you set aside Wrestling the B10 is well below the other major conferences in major sport championships over the last half century. Anyway, just my rant today for 1st amendment rights on SEOPS and may everyone have a great day.
Better be careful... making comments like this could get you banned.

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:36 am
by Bleeding Red
Raiderball wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:58 pm
Bleeding Red wrote: Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:52 am
Raiderball wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:30 pm

Saw many positive posts from him on Brohm at Purdue and Frost at Nebraska. If you want to call pointing out the lack of passing attack by Wisc, NW, Sparty... then ok but from the stats I saw they deserved bashing. 7-26 and less than 100 yds? LOL
I saw very little positive posts about anything other than the SEC from him. When you come on to an Ohio based site that has primarily Ohio based fans and constantly bash the most popular team on that site AND their fan base, you get what is coming to you.

If he is was so stupid as to get warnings and continue to do it, good for the mods for getting rid of him. Good riddance.
So anyone with a difference of opinion we just ban them from the site? LOL what a joke. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
No hardly. But there is a list of very clear rules. Have you ever read them? Maybe Ole General should have.

Re: Valenth's FINAL Top 10 College Football Rankings

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:37 am
by Bleeding Red
Raiderball wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:58 pm
Bleeding Red wrote: Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:52 am
Raiderball wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:30 pm

Saw many positive posts from him on Brohm at Purdue and Frost at Nebraska. If you want to call pointing out the lack of passing attack by Wisc, NW, Sparty... then ok but from the stats I saw they deserved bashing. 7-26 and less than 100 yds? LOL
I saw very little positive posts about anything other than the SEC from him. When you come on to an Ohio based site that has primarily Ohio based fans and constantly bash the most popular team on that site AND their fan base, you get what is coming to you.

If he is was so stupid as to get warnings and continue to do it, good for the mods for getting rid of him. Good riddance.
So anyone with a difference of opinion we just ban them from the site? LOL what a joke. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Please dude........stop underplaying what he did as "Difference of opinion". You have very good commentary to this forum concerning football so I know that you're smart enough to know the difference.