formerfcfan wrote:If there was one observation I drew from reading an earlier edition of yours' pfloyd, was how high Logan Elm was ranked despite them having to squeak one out versus Amanda Clearcreek. The Aces aren't that good. I'm not at all trying to insinuate you did a poor job, because you do great jobs and I appreciate your labors, but that makes this average joe sit back and think "if this one of the better teams then SEO basketball is down."
… I've seen LE twice (vs Grandview Heights, vs Circleville) both losses for the Braves BOTH could have been "Ws" - but not … out of ALL of the teams I have seen this season Logan Elm is 1 or 2 as far defense goes … offensively Coach Stiverson's crew has struggled coming up with the scorers - Ridge Young is a given but others obviously need to decide they are going to play the role of scorers as well - it will happen …. might not be until next year BUT it will happen - then you will have a team like last years District team … they are ranked at #15 which MAY be a little high right NOW but when I look at the program, the coaching, the D it's hard to drop them on a fast track … most teams have played 6-7 games … there's still 2/3 of the regular season left to play IF Logan Elm struggles they will continue to fall but I don't see them being less than a .500 team and at .500 there will NOT be a team in the Logan Sectional who will want to play them …
… there are teams below LE which are moving up the rankings and the committee of one - me - will have to adjust the rankings accordingly :
VC
Lynchburg Clay
Fairland
Valley
… while Adena, Paint Valley need to gets some key "W's" to hold serve …