SoutheasternOhioPreps.com

This game is going to be bad. Very bad. Full Stop Irontons offensive line is undersized and slow - STILL Irontons depth is non existent - STILL Ironton has no real playmaker speed at ANY position - STILL Ironton will still miss tackles and commit turnovers at a pretty steady clip. The only so called...

So basically around 40. Same talent pool. Conceeding the potential for them to be in better physical condition than the last 3 or 4 years prior - although we havent anything to actually measure that assertion by - I'm guessing 49- 6 Wheelersburg.

fbnut wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:46 pm

ITSYABOY72 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:25 pm Earlier on in one of these threads I read that Irontons roster will have around 58/60 boys which is significantly more than the last 5 - 6 years however now I am hearing it is closer to 38/40?

58/60 give or take 20

That seems a lot closer to reality. Lol

Earlier on in one of these threads I read that Irontons roster will have around 58/60 boys which is significantly more than the last 5 - 6 years however now I am hearing it is closer to 38/40?

I noticed the preseason rankings were released, https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleveland.com%2Fexpo%2Fsports%2Ferry-2018%2F07%2Fb5bfc57ca76765%2Froad-to-canton-2018-ohsaa-foot.html&h=AT2ZGukgwnuIJfbd_WpCdF_mV9fZxFH_i1UgmHcu4sK5USr7qXpA7amXxvzK71Yy0TYo8-AkysXD_eIaF6uCVwMxH9xX8FS...

Sorry dude. Your written vernacular is too sophisticated for this forum. Your above statement should have said, “I have read a bunch of crap on this topic and no one seems to have any proof of anything that would change my mind that Burg wouldn’t throttle ironton again.” So what do you think these ...

I have read a generous share of hyperbole and superlatives thus far - but not much substance. Declarations of returned swagger. Alleged increases in enthusiasm or discipline - which are all equally questionable to begin with because most of these descripts are not absolutes and are more accurately ...

It would seem to me based on the last few years especially, that the disparities regarding depth when you compare Ironton/Wheelersburg, coupled with the manner in which Wheelersburg has utterly dominated Ironton on the field, in the weight room, in the film room, by way of scheme and game management...

I have read a generous share of hyperbole and superlatives thus far - but not much substance. Declarations of returned swagger. Alleged increases in enthusiasm or discipline - which are all equally questionable to begin with because most of these descripts are not absolutes and are more accurately d...

Final observation. As it concerns week one vs Wheelersburg. Ironton has added new talent? That is the only thing I can logically come up with that would indicate much deviation from the former staffs results vs Wheelersburg because it is clear, without prejudice or nuance, that Ironton does NOT have...

Something else that came to mind. And my #'s may be slightly skewed so I am open to correction. However, the last/former staff/HC in 5 years, recorded somewhere around a 60% wiining percentage as it concerned winning their conference ( OVC) and they qualified for the post season at around a 40% clip...

I guess I am trying to understand how conclusions are being reached regarding Discipline - perception based Motivation - perception based Enthusiasm - perception based Conditioning - compared to? Etc etc etc -- based on an incomplete sum? Measured against what exactly? And how do you measure 4 weeks...