SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Who wins?

 
Total votes: 0

javagt
Varsity
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Parkersburg, WV

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by javagt »

On the other hand. Logan isn't stopping too many 2nd and 10's and 3rd and medium's.


coal miner's son
Freshman Team
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:22 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by coal miner's son »

Yea, but Portsmouth and Jackson did and Gallia WILL.


loganlocos
SEOP
Posts: 4119
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by loganlocos »

Logan Vs Warren All-Time Series History (Since 1912)

Total Games: 24
First Game: 1986
Logan Wins: 21
Warren Wins: 3
Total Score: Logan 863 (36 per game), Warren 287 (12 per game)
Last Logan Win: 2009, 31-15 at Warren
Last Warren Win: 1997, 31-28 at Warren
Current Streak: Logan has won 12 straight meetings

Year By Year Results:
Year ---- Location ---- Winning Team ---- Score
1986 ---- Logan ------- Logan ----------- 07-06
1987 ---- Warren ------ Logan ----------- 21-07
1988 ---- Logan ------- Logan ----------- 12-07
1989 ---- Warren ------ Logan ----------- 06-00
1990 ---- Logan ------ Logan ----------- 26-13
1991 ---- Warren ------ Logan ----------- 21-20 (OT)
1992 ---- Logan ------ Logan ----------- 42-09
1993 ---- Warren ------ Logan ----------- 49-15
1994 ---- Logan ------- Logan ----------- 38-14
1995 ---- Warren ------ Warren ---------- 25-34
1996 ---- Logan ------- Warren ---------- 31-32
1997 ---- Warren ------ Warren ---------- 28-31
1998 ---- Logan ------- Logan ----------- 21-14 (OT)
1999 ---- Warren ------- Logan ---------- 35-07
2000 ---- Logan -------- Logan ---------- 56-27
2001 ---- Warren ------- Logan ---------- 42-00
2002 ---- Logan -------- Logan ---------- 53-07
2003 ---- Warren ------- Logan ---------- 42-00
2004 ---- Logan -------- Logan ---------- 62-15
2005 ---- Warren ------- Logan ----------- 48-07
2006 ---- Warren ------- Logan ----------- 65-00
2007 ---- Logan -------- Logan ----------- 60-07
2008 ---- Logan -------- Logan ----------- 42-00
2009 ---- Warren -------- Logan ---------- 31-15
2010 ---- Warren


klaw10
Riding the Bench
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by klaw10 »

For those of you calling out the Logan coaches. Dale's first 8 years he was 37-43, including two 2-8 teams. Not exactly impressive. Secondly regarding the development of feeder programs, I do think to a point it is important to have some involvement, but to suggest coaches have additional time during season to spend with the T-hawks is a bit myopic. They are already putting in 80+ hour weeks and have their own families to tend to. Such expectations are not only unrealistic but also unfair.

Tough times bring out a man's true character. I think it is clear that a number of "fans" are lacking in this particular area. As I alluded to in a seperate thread "the rats are jumping ship"

"Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." -
-- Theodore Roosevelt


User avatar
C-Bolt
SEOP
Posts: 3762
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:11 am

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by C-Bolt »

Maybe the T-Hawk coaches ought to go to them on thier own time and learn some stuff since their not as busy as the Varsity staff.


loganlocos
SEOP
Posts: 4119
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by loganlocos »

klaw10 wrote:For those of you calling out the Logan coaches. Dale's first 8 years he was 37-43, including two 2-8 teams. Not exactly impressive. Secondly regarding the development of feeder programs, I do think to a point it is important to have some involvement, but to suggest coaches have additional time during season to spend with the T-hawks is a bit myopic. They are already putting in 80+ hour weeks and have their own families to tend to. Such expectations are not only unrealistic but also unfair.

Tough times bring out a man's true character. I think it is clear that a number of "fans" are lacking in this particular area. As I alluded to in a seperate thread "the rats are jumping ship"

"Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." -
-- Theodore Roosevelt
klaw -

I have said on this forum and others that it took Dale a good 6-8 years to build and develop his program. And like the current staff, the program was in pretty darn good shape when he took over (41-10 over the 5 previous years).

I believe in this staff. They are experienced coaches. They are coaches who have a track record of success. Things haven't worked this year, and they'd be the first to tell you that.

But I agree, there are more "fans" quitting on this team and staff than there are problems with the kids and/or coaches.

As for the Tomahawks thing, klaw is DEAD right. To expect the coaching staff to be ACTIVELY involved in a development program is unrealistic, and quite honestly, stupid. I hope the Varsity staff is devoting every hour they have for football the the Logan football program.

The staff could embrace a feeder system without being directly involved. But I don't think for a second that Coach Wolfe, Coach Walsh, or Coach Huntsberger should leave Varsity practice and head out to help the feeder system. Those guys are devoting INSANE hours as it is.


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9270
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by dazed&confused »

LoganLocos wrote: As for the Tomahawks thing, klaw is DEAD right. To expect the coaching staff to be ACTIVELY involved in a development program is unrealistic, and quite honestly, stupid. I hope the Varsity staff is devoting every hour they have for football the the Logan football program.

The staff could embrace a feeder system without being directly involved. But I don't think for a second that Coach Wolfe, Coach Walsh, or Coach Huntsberger should leave Varsity practice and head out to help the feeder system. Those guys are devoting INSANE hours as it is.
I agree one hundred percent with that. However, recognition and encouragement of the Biddy Leagues would be helpful, including perhaps providing instructional materials to the teams. What you really want is for the fundamentals and the spirit of teamwork to be taught here. Also, do the Tomahawks get to play in Chieftain Stadium? I hope so but if not, allowing them at least one game there would go a long way toward getting kids enthused about the program. Now, I'm going to bow out of this because it has been so long since I had any association with the Tomahawks, I can't really speak to what is going on there. I know when my son played, a lot of individuals donated their free time and took parental abuse to coach and teach the kids. They deserve far more than my mentioning it here can ever repay.


User avatar
bluedevil
JV Team
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:46 am

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by bluedevil »

logans schedule has been alot stronger than warren....ill take logan by 2+ touchdowns


User avatar
1987chieftains
SEOPS H
Posts: 7594
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by 1987chieftains »

klaw10 wrote:For those of you calling out the Logan coaches. Dale's first 8 years he was 37-43, including two 2-8 teams. Not exactly impressive. Secondly regarding the development of feeder programs, I do think to a point it is important to have some involvement, but to suggest coaches have additional time during season to spend with the T-hawks is a bit myopic. They are already putting in 80+ hour weeks and have their own families to tend to. Such expectations are not only unrealistic but also unfair.

Tough times bring out a man's true character. I think it is clear that a number of "fans" are lacking in this particular area. As I alluded to in a seperate thread "the rats are jumping ship"
"Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." -
-- Theodore Roosevelt
bubby, i've going to LOGAN CHIEFTAIN football games since to 70's!


klaw10
Riding the Bench
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by klaw10 »

1987chieftains wrote:
klaw10 wrote:For those of you calling out the Logan coaches. Dale's first 8 years he was 37-43, including two 2-8 teams. Not exactly impressive. Secondly regarding the development of feeder programs, I do think to a point it is important to have some involvement, but to suggest coaches have additional time during season to spend with the T-hawks is a bit myopic. They are already putting in 80+ hour weeks and have their own families to tend to. Such expectations are not only unrealistic but also unfair.

Tough times bring out a man's true character. I think it is clear that a number of "fans" are lacking in this particular area. As I alluded to in a seperate thread "the rats are jumping ship"
"Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." -
-- Theodore Roosevelt
bubby, i've going to LOGAN CHIEFTAIN football games since to 70's!

Congratulations.......what is your point?


loganlocos
SEOP
Posts: 4119
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by loganlocos »

LOGAN VS WARREN PROJECTED STARTING LINE-UPS (at Warren, 10/8/2010)

LOGAN OFFENSE
QB - 17 - Jordan Jurgensmier - 6'1 - 185lbs - SR
RB - 24 - Cory McCarty - 5'10 - 180lbs - Soph
FB - 36 - Michael Simpson - 5'11 - 185lbs - Soph
SB - 25 - Dylan Cavinee - 5'10 - 175lbs - SR
SE - 10 - Isaac Lindsey - 5'11 - 165lbs - JR
SE/TE - 11 - Nate Poling - 6'4 - 185lbs - SR
RT - 72 - Clayton Kiger - 6'4 - 210lbs - SR
RG - 51 - Tyler Dement - 5'6 - 180lbs - SR
C - 78 - Garrett Clark - 5'7 - 180lbs - SR
LG - 66 - Aaron Wolfe - 5'10 - 215lbs - JR
LT - 70 - Tim King - 6'2 - 240lbs - SR
Other Offensive Players:
OG - 73 - Nathan Chandler - 6'1 - 205lbs - SR
WR - 12 - Kelly Long - 5'11 - 165lbs - JR
SE/TE - 15 - Jordan Sharb - 5'11 - 175lbs - JR
OL - 67 - Coy Blair - 6'3 - 330lbs - JR
WR - 22 - Brian Cook - 5'10 - 170lbs - SR
FB - 99 - Paul Wesselhoeft - 6'1 - 205lbs - JR
TE - 48 - Kenny Simpson - 6'3 - 185lbs - Soph

Warren Defense
DE - 86 - Jeremy Fivecoat - 6'3 - 195lbs - JR
DT - 51 - Brian Hendrix - 6'0 - 235lbs - SR
DT - 75 - Joey Lane - 6'2 - 255lbs - SR
or...
DT - 63 - Corey Goodman - 6'0 - 280lbs - SR
DE - 52 - Cody Church - 6'0 - 205lbs - SR
LB - 32 - Tanner Barrows - 6'0 - 193lbs - Soph
LB - 33 - Austin Henthorn - 5'11 - 190lbs - JR
LB - 41 - Dustin Harlow - 6'2 - 191lbs - JR
or...
LB - 85 - Josh Windland - 6'3 - 190lbs - JR
CB - 21 - Nate Root - 5'8 - 150lbs - SR
FS - 01 - Grant Venham - 6'3 - 210lbs - SR
SS - 10 - Justin Hilverding - 6'0 - 160lbs - SR
CB - 04 - Chas Miller - 5'10 - 160lbs - Soph
Other Defensive Players:
DB - 24 - Tyler Ward - 5'11 - 165lbs - JR
DE - 26 - Justyn Rohr - 5'11 - 205lbs - SR
LB - 16 - Aaron Higgins - 5'10 - 178lbs - JR
DB - 19 - Josh Mays - ?'? - ???lbs - ??

WARREN OFFENSE
QB - 18 - Dylan Leffingwell - 6'2 - 200lbs - Soph
RB - 33 - Austin Henthorn - 5'11 - 190lbs - JR
SB - 19 - Josh Mays - ?'? - ???lbs - ??
SB - 05 - Jeremy Hastie - 5'9 - 163lbs - JR
SE - 01 - Grant Venham - 6'3 - 210lbs - SR
SE - 86 - Jeremy Fivecoat - 6'3 - 195lbs - JR
OT - 77 - Nathan Greathouse - 6'3 - 300lbs - SR
OG - 54 - Aaron Tenney - 6'1 - 240lbs - SR
C - 50 - Dustin Timberman - 6'1 - 235lbs - SR
OG - 51 - Brian Hendrix - 6'1 - 235lbs - SR
OT - 78 - Jimmy Buck - 6'3 - 280lbs - JR
Other Offensive Players:
RB - 41 - Dustin Harlow - 6'2 - 190lbs - JR
SB - 24 - Tyler Ward - 5'11 - 165lbs - JR
OL - 55 - Travis Coy - 6'0 - 240lbs - SR
WR - 03 - Andrew Vincent - 6'1 - 165lbs - Soph

LOGAN DEFENSE
DE - 15 - Jordan Sharb - 5'11 - 175lbs - JR
DT - 67 - Coy Blair - 6'3 - 330lbs - JR
NG - 99 - Paul Wesselhoeft - 6'1 - 205lbs - JR
DT - 51 - Tyler Dement - 5'6 - 180lbs - SR
DE - 57 - Jacob Hood - 6'0 - 180lbs - SR
LB - 25 - Dylan Cavinee - 5'10 - 175lbs - SR
LB - 70 - Tim King - 6'2 - 240lbs - SR
LB - 22 - Brian Cook - 5'10 - 170lbs - SR
CB - 10 - Isaac Lindsey - 5'11 - 165lbs - JR
CB - 33 - Sean Wotring - 5'10 - 170lbs - JR
FS - 17 - Jordan Jurgensmier - 6'1 - 185lbs - SR
Other Defensive Players:
DT - 73 - Nathan Chandler - 6'1 - 205lbs - SR
LB - 41 - Rusty Knece - 5'8 - 165lbs - JR
DB - 12 - Kelly Long - 5'11 - 165lbs - JR
DE - 11 - Nate Poling - 6'4 - 185lbs - SR
DL - 50 - Alex Schneider - 5'9 - 205lbs - JR
LB - 34 - Gaven Jourdan - 5'11 - 175lbs - Soph
LB - 24 - Cory McCarty - 5'10 - 180lbs - Soph

LOGAN SPECIALISTS
PK - 86 - Derek Montgomery - 6'0 - 200lbs - SR
HO - 34 - Gaven Jourdan - 5'11 - 175lbs - Soph
LS - 15 - Jordan Sharb - 5'11 - 175lbs - JR

P - 86 - Derek Montgomery - 6'0 - 200lbs - SR

KR - 25 - Dylan Cavinee - 5'10 - 175lbs - SR
PR/KR - 10 - Isaac Lindsey - 5'11 - 165lbs - JR
PR - 12 - Kelly Long - 5'11 - 165lbs - JR

WARREN SPECIALISTS
PK - 04 - Chas Miller - 5'10 - 160lbs - Soph
HO -
LS -

KO - 33 - Austin Henthorn - 5'11 - 190lbs - JR

P - 01 - Grant Venham - 6'3 - 210lbs - SR

PR - 01 - Grant Venham - 6'3 - 210lbs - SR
KR - 19 - Josh Mays - ?'? - ???lbs - ??
KR - 05 - Jeremy Hastie - 5'9 - 163lbs - JR


loganlocos
SEOP
Posts: 4119
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by loganlocos »

Little unsure of the injury situation at Warren so if anyone has some insight I would appreciate it. PM if you have some info. Thanks.


User avatar
ZvilleBlueDevil
JV Team
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:45 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by ZvilleBlueDevil »

Logan 28-7 ....


User avatar
1987chieftains
SEOPS H
Posts: 7594
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by 1987chieftains »

1987chieftains wrote:
klaw10 wrote:For those of you calling out the Logan coaches. Dale's first 8 years he was 37-43, including two 2-8 teams. Not exactly impressive. Secondly regarding the development of feeder programs, I do think to a point it is important to have some involvement, but to suggest coaches have additional time during season to spend with the T-hawks is a bit myopic. They are already putting in 80+ hour weeks and have their own families to tend to. Such expectations are not only unrealistic but also unfair.

Tough times bring out a man's true character. I think it is clear that a number of "fans" are lacking in this particular area. As I alluded to in a seperate thread "the rats are jumping ship"
"Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." -
-- Theodore Roosevelt
bubby, i've going to LOGAN CHIEFTAIN football games since to 70's!
i was getting the impression your post is/was directed at what i said. if i jumped the gun please let me know.


klaw10
Riding the Bench
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by klaw10 »

1987chieftains wrote:
1987chieftains wrote:
klaw10 wrote:For those of you calling out the Logan coaches. Dale's first 8 years he was 37-43, including two 2-8 teams. Not exactly impressive. Secondly regarding the development of feeder programs, I do think to a point it is important to have some involvement, but to suggest coaches have additional time during season to spend with the T-hawks is a bit myopic. They are already putting in 80+ hour weeks and have their own families to tend to. Such expectations are not only unrealistic but also unfair.

Tough times bring out a man's true character. I think it is clear that a number of "fans" are lacking in this particular area. As I alluded to in a seperate thread "the rats are jumping ship"
"Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." -
-- Theodore Roosevelt
bubby, i've going to LOGAN CHIEFTAIN football games since to 70's!
i was getting the impression your post is/was directed at what i said. if i jumped the gun please let me know.
Not at all. My post was directed at a number of others who consistently criticize coaches and players. Never seen that from you in the least


User avatar
SSReaper
Waterboy
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:56 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by SSReaper »

Klaw10 you really know how to beat a dead horse. Everyone is offering good insight to what they individually think would help the program here with ideas. You should stop critisizing every person on here and just discuss the game at hand which is Logan Vs. Warren. Besides I highly doubt you personally know every person on here so it is cowardly and rude, to say the least, to say fans are "rats" jumping ship. Just because fans are dissapointed or unhappy with the team's progress, or lack thereof, doesn't justify calling anybody a "rat". Just discuss the game at hand and leave the rest of it out. You all burned me for calling out the D coach, but calling out fans that support and keep the program running is just as unacceptable. So follow your own example and cease and desist the negativity. Thx. GO LOGAN.


javagt
Varsity
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Parkersburg, WV

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by javagt »

Is Logan's Graham out for the year?


zbd
Freshman Team
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:39 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by zbd »

[quote="moonschein"]Guy's lets' not rush to judgement on the coaching staff. Just look at Gallia, Jackson and even Zanesville as examples, It will take at least one and a half years for the program to adjust. By the 2nd year Logan better be in a postion to to win the championship and finish around 7-3 tp 8-2 or then we need to look at the coaching staff and make changes!

I agree with the post give the staff a chance i would even atlest 3yrs to get there system in place you guys have had 10 good years be thankful for that there are programs who have one good year and 10 bad ones. Dont give up on the staff or the kids support them every friday night. So after saying all that I will go with Warren by 14 or more.


loganlocos
SEOP
Posts: 4119
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by loganlocos »

Yes, Graham is out for the year.

I've heard Chandler will most likely be cleared for Friday and Long got back in the action last week. Logan should be as close to full health as they will be all year. Still a number of "back-ups" nursing injuries though.


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9270
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: SEOAL: Logan (1-5) at Warren (4-2)

Post by dazed&confused »

In addition to the health factor, it will help to have the more experienced players back on the field. I still think actual playing time leadership on the field has been lacking. Players who have more of a feel for the gameplan and what is going on during the game help to make for better execution. In addition, several players who have gained considerable "crucial" minutes are beginning to contribute. This will be only the second game Logan has played on grass this year. I personally feel a (slower) grass surface may be more to Logan's personnel this year. Should be a good one but I can't make it. I'll be listening. Go Chiefs!


Post Reply

Return to “Football”