1000? lol.madpolecat wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 9:12 am https://www.rio.edu/jobs-opportunities
Posting wants college experioence.
There will be 1,000 applicants with some college experience for that job. And the posting hasn't even hit FootballScoop yet.
Unless somebody has a good "in" with the people making the call at Rio, no HS coach in the area even gets a whiff of the HC spot.
Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:21 pm
- Location: Burg
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
-
- All State
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:03 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
It's probably only a slight exaggeration. The number of guys who would take any first college HC job just to step to the next one is nuts, beacuse they believe EVERY JOB IS JUST A STEP ON THE WAY TO THE BIG TIME.2quick2catch wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 10:37 am1000? lol.madpolecat wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 9:12 am https://www.rio.edu/jobs-opportunities
Posting wants college experioence.
There will be 1,000 applicants with some college experience for that job. And the posting hasn't even hit FootballScoop yet.
Unless somebody has a good "in" with the people making the call at Rio, no HS coach in the area even gets a whiff of the HC spot.
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
This is why I believe a local HS guy is the best fit. Get a guy who you could plan on being there a decade. And lets be honest, NAIA is glorified HS football anyways.madpolecat wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:30 amIt's probably only a slight exaggeration. The number of guys who would take any first college HC job just to step to the next one is nuts, beacuse they believe EVERY JOB IS JUST A STEP ON THE WAY TO THE BIG TIME.2quick2catch wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 10:37 am1000? lol.madpolecat wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 9:12 am https://www.rio.edu/jobs-opportunities
Posting wants college experioence.
There will be 1,000 applicants with some college experience for that job. And the posting hasn't even hit FootballScoop yet.
Unless somebody has a good "in" with the people making the call at Rio, no HS coach in the area even gets a whiff of the HC spot.
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 5:13 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
Wondering if pay will be good enough to get a good high school to take the job.
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 6:36 am
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
I think if contacted Woodward would have to take the call. His wife is a professor at SSU so maybe Rio tries to offer some kind of deal for everyone. He’s been a coach/teacher for more than 20 years, what does that do for retirement? Could he defer retirement? Didn’t he play at Ohio Wesleyan? So he does have college experience.
I think he has a Master’s degree so maybe could coach and teach some. I have no idea what his career goal is. But if he has any college aspirations and he’s contacted this may be the last chance.
Or, they hire Pendleton who knows.
I think he has a Master’s degree so maybe could coach and teach some. I have no idea what his career goal is. But if he has any college aspirations and he’s contacted this may be the last chance.
Or, they hire Pendleton who knows.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:03 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
If you can convince a group of college admin. of this fact, more power to you. But my guess is that just like a lot of HS interview situations, name dropping has magical effects (I coached with ____, and he's at (Insert Big-time school) now).Ohio1979 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:41 amThis is why I believe a local HS guy is the best fit. Get a guy who you could plan on being there a decade. And lets be honest, NAIA is glorified HS football anyways.madpolecat wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:30 amIt's probably only a slight exaggeration. The number of guys who would take any first college HC job just to step to the next one is nuts, beacuse they believe EVERY JOB IS JUST A STEP ON THE WAY TO THE BIG TIME.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:03 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
anything less than six figures is essentially a lateral move to a tecaher with 20 years who is used to getting supplementals.Lucky Charms wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:47 am Wondering if pay will be good enough to get a good high school to take the job.
But the more I think about it, who can afford the job?
An experienced HS teacher/coach with a family? Move your family for no signif pay increase and significant hours/stress increase. If he can sell it to his family as "It's my dream to coach college ball"... maybe.
You'll end up with a young up-and-comer (3-4 years small colleg coordinator work) who will pass through, or an old timer working through retirement.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:03 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
I believe that they want college coaching experience. Lots of us have college playing experience (even if it was 30 years ago).CuckooNest wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:14 pm I think if contacted Woodward would have to take the call. His wife is a professor at SSU so maybe Rio tries to offer some kind of deal for everyone. He’s been a coach/teacher for more than 20 years, what does that do for retirement? Could he defer retirement? Didn’t he play at Ohio Wesleyan? So he does have college experience.
I think he has a Master’s degree so maybe could coach and teach some. I have no idea what his career goal is. But if he has any college aspirations and he’s contacted this may be the last chance.
Or, they hire Pendleton who knows.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
Going for a high school coach isn’t going to accomplish anything. Coaching a homogenous group of high schoolers that you’ll have consistent upflow with from a JR high isn’t transferable to maintaining a program of adults (of various ages and backgrounds) — a program that you have to tie together, or else there’s upheaval in the locker room with adult personalities, with the added complications that the players can easily leave on their own (and they will) along with the resource exhaustion that comes with recruiting.
I don’t see SE Ohio being a fruitful area to emphasize recruiting in Rio’s case. There may be, what, 200 football-playing seniors annually across the region? That’s not a sizable number to concentrate recruiting towards when…
1) roughly half of those kids are going to be either in the trades, enlisting, intend on getting a degree through the OU system, or are going to bigger schools for undergrad;
2) there’s going to be overlap with the ‘I want to play X sport in college’ demographic in which those seniors are intending to play basketball or baseball instead somewhere in college;
3a) the marketplace of sub-FBS opportunities doesn’t bode well for Rio in recruiting whatever remaining percentage of kids want to keep playing football in college (20%? So, 40 kids in the region annually?) The abundance of D2 and D3’s in this state already is a challenge for RG. Those programs are more established and are in more geographically compact conferences. 3b) The NCAC and OAC schools are going to have generally more tools of persuasion (location; facilities; fraternities and network) than Rio for that pool of kids.
Adding football is going to be expensive. It’s bold, ambitious but very risky for a school like RG. The crucial part within getting the coach right is the coach has to be able to recruit, and retain, a roster of adults that otherwise wouldn’t be going to Rio. That’s going to require experience. Get the hire wrong and get someone who is inexperienced with the mores of small college football, and you have a disaster on your hands.
I don’t see SE Ohio being a fruitful area to emphasize recruiting in Rio’s case. There may be, what, 200 football-playing seniors annually across the region? That’s not a sizable number to concentrate recruiting towards when…
1) roughly half of those kids are going to be either in the trades, enlisting, intend on getting a degree through the OU system, or are going to bigger schools for undergrad;
2) there’s going to be overlap with the ‘I want to play X sport in college’ demographic in which those seniors are intending to play basketball or baseball instead somewhere in college;
3a) the marketplace of sub-FBS opportunities doesn’t bode well for Rio in recruiting whatever remaining percentage of kids want to keep playing football in college (20%? So, 40 kids in the region annually?) The abundance of D2 and D3’s in this state already is a challenge for RG. Those programs are more established and are in more geographically compact conferences. 3b) The NCAC and OAC schools are going to have generally more tools of persuasion (location; facilities; fraternities and network) than Rio for that pool of kids.
Adding football is going to be expensive. It’s bold, ambitious but very risky for a school like RG. The crucial part within getting the coach right is the coach has to be able to recruit, and retain, a roster of adults that otherwise wouldn’t be going to Rio. That’s going to require experience. Get the hire wrong and get someone who is inexperienced with the mores of small college football, and you have a disaster on your hands.
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2022 11:09 am
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
formerfcfan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 1:57 pm Going for a high school coach isn’t going to accomplish anything. Coaching a homogenous group of high schoolers that you’ll have consistent upflow with from a JR high isn’t transferable to maintaining a program of adults (of various ages and backgrounds) — a program that you have to tie together, or else there’s upheaval in the locker room with adult personalities, with the added complications that the players can easily leave on their own (and they will) along with the resource exhaustion that comes with recruiting.
I don’t see SE Ohio being a fruitful area to emphasize recruiting in Rio’s case. There may be, what, 200 football-playing seniors annually across the region? That’s not a sizable number to concentrate recruiting towards when…
1) roughly half of those kids are going to be either in the trades, enlisting, intend on getting a degree through the OU system, or are going to bigger schools for undergrad;
2) there’s going to be overlap with the ‘I want to play X sport in college’ demographic in which those seniors are intending to play basketball or baseball instead somewhere in college;
3a) the marketplace of sub-FBS opportunities doesn’t bode well for Rio in recruiting whatever remaining percentage of kids want to keep playing football in college (20%? So, 40 kids in the region annually?) The abundance of D2 and D3’s in this state already is a challenge for RG. Those programs are more established and are in more geographically compact conferences. 3b) The NCAC and OAC schools are going to have generally more tools of persuasion (location; facilities; fraternities and network) than Rio for that pool of kids.
Adding football is going to be expensive. It’s bold, ambitious but very risky for a school like RG. The crucial part within getting the coach right is the coach has to be able to recruit, and retain, a roster of adults that otherwise wouldn’t be going to Rio. That’s going to require experience. Get the hire wrong and get someone who is inexperienced with the mores of small college football, and you have a disaster on your hands.
Very well said I was surprised to see them add football considering the success they’ve had at the NAIA level for both soccer and basketball. As you mentioned a lot of those D2 and D3 teams in our state will be what many will choose if they want to continue playing and are somewhat decent
2019 Heisman Trophy Winner, 2019 National Champion
-
- All State
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:03 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
YES!!!formerfcfan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 1:57 pm Going for a high school coach isn’t going to accomplish anything. Coaching a homogenous group of high schoolers that you’ll have consistent upflow with from a JR high isn’t transferable to maintaining a program of adults (of various ages and backgrounds) — a program that you have to tie together, or else there’s upheaval in the locker room with adult personalities, with the added complications that the players can easily leave on their own (and they will) along with the resource exhaustion that comes with recruiting.
I don’t see SE Ohio being a fruitful area to emphasize recruiting in Rio’s case. There may be, what, 200 football-playing seniors annually across the region? That’s not a sizable number to concentrate recruiting towards when…
1) roughly half of those kids are going to be either in the trades, enlisting, intend on getting a degree through the OU system, or are going to bigger schools for undergrad;
2) there’s going to be overlap with the ‘I want to play X sport in college’ demographic in which those seniors are intending to play basketball or baseball instead somewhere in college;
3a) the marketplace of sub-FBS opportunities doesn’t bode well for Rio in recruiting whatever remaining percentage of kids want to keep playing football in college (20%? So, 40 kids in the region annually?) The abundance of D2 and D3’s in this state already is a challenge for RG. Those programs are more established and are in more geographically compact conferences. 3b) The NCAC and OAC schools are going to have generally more tools of persuasion (location; facilities; fraternities and network) than Rio for that pool of kids.
Adding football is going to be expensive. It’s bold, ambitious but very risky for a school like RG. The crucial part within getting the coach right is the coach has to be able to recruit, and retain, a roster of adults that otherwise wouldn’t be going to Rio. That’s going to require experience. Get the hire wrong and get someone who is inexperienced with the mores of small college football, and you have a disaster on your hands.
Rio will not be building a meaninful football program from just parts in SEO Ohio. Not that there aren't some good pieces here... there just aren't enough.
Look at URG hoops or track... see how many of those athletes come from with 50 miles.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:03 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
100 new FTEs is still 100 new FTEs. That's what they are thinking.Jeaux Burreaux wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:07 pmformerfcfan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 1:57 pm Going for a high school coach isn’t going to accomplish anything. Coaching a homogenous group of high schoolers that you’ll have consistent upflow with from a JR high isn’t transferable to maintaining a program of adults (of various ages and backgrounds) — a program that you have to tie together, or else there’s upheaval in the locker room with adult personalities, with the added complications that the players can easily leave on their own (and they will) along with the resource exhaustion that comes with recruiting.
I don’t see SE Ohio being a fruitful area to emphasize recruiting in Rio’s case. There may be, what, 200 football-playing seniors annually across the region? That’s not a sizable number to concentrate recruiting towards when…
1) roughly half of those kids are going to be either in the trades, enlisting, intend on getting a degree through the OU system, or are going to bigger schools for undergrad;
2) there’s going to be overlap with the ‘I want to play X sport in college’ demographic in which those seniors are intending to play basketball or baseball instead somewhere in college;
3a) the marketplace of sub-FBS opportunities doesn’t bode well for Rio in recruiting whatever remaining percentage of kids want to keep playing football in college (20%? So, 40 kids in the region annually?) The abundance of D2 and D3’s in this state already is a challenge for RG. Those programs are more established and are in more geographically compact conferences. 3b) The NCAC and OAC schools are going to have generally more tools of persuasion (location; facilities; fraternities and network) than Rio for that pool of kids.
Adding football is going to be expensive. It’s bold, ambitious but very risky for a school like RG. The crucial part within getting the coach right is the coach has to be able to recruit, and retain, a roster of adults that otherwise wouldn’t be going to Rio. That’s going to require experience. Get the hire wrong and get someone who is inexperienced with the mores of small college football, and you have a disaster on your hands.
Very well said I was surprised to see them add football considering the success they’ve had at the NAIA level for both soccer and basketball. As you mentioned a lot of those D2 and D3 teams in our state will be what many will choose if they want to continue playing and are somewhat decent
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
I think Rio’s calling card on football recruiting is going to be in the cities. Akron, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Detroit, Indianapolis, Youngstown and perhaps Norfolk/Newport News/VA Beach. That, plus the suburbs.Jeaux Burreaux wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:07 pmformerfcfan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 1:57 pm Going for a high school coach isn’t going to accomplish anything. Coaching a homogenous group of high schoolers that you’ll have consistent upflow with from a JR high isn’t transferable to maintaining a program of adults (of various ages and backgrounds) — a program that you have to tie together, or else there’s upheaval in the locker room with adult personalities, with the added complications that the players can easily leave on their own (and they will) along with the resource exhaustion that comes with recruiting.
I don’t see SE Ohio being a fruitful area to emphasize recruiting in Rio’s case. There may be, what, 200 football-playing seniors annually across the region? That’s not a sizable number to concentrate recruiting towards when…
1) roughly half of those kids are going to be either in the trades, enlisting, intend on getting a degree through the OU system, or are going to bigger schools for undergrad;
2) there’s going to be overlap with the ‘I want to play X sport in college’ demographic in which those seniors are intending to play basketball or baseball instead somewhere in college;
3a) the marketplace of sub-FBS opportunities doesn’t bode well for Rio in recruiting whatever remaining percentage of kids want to keep playing football in college (20%? So, 40 kids in the region annually?) The abundance of D2 and D3’s in this state already is a challenge for RG. Those programs are more established and are in more geographically compact conferences. 3b) The NCAC and OAC schools are going to have generally more tools of persuasion (location; facilities; fraternities and network) than Rio for that pool of kids.
Adding football is going to be expensive. It’s bold, ambitious but very risky for a school like RG. The crucial part within getting the coach right is the coach has to be able to recruit, and retain, a roster of adults that otherwise wouldn’t be going to Rio. That’s going to require experience. Get the hire wrong and get someone who is inexperienced with the mores of small college football, and you have a disaster on your hands.
Very well said I was surprised to see them add football considering the success they’ve had at the NAIA level for both soccer and basketball. As you mentioned a lot of those D2 and D3 teams in our state will be what many will choose if they want to continue playing and are somewhat decent
With the “recruit the cities” you can get a swath of kids who are desperate to be spending their 20’s/adulthood somewhere else other than their neighborhood. Change of scenery aspect. You could lose some in the first year (‘this place isn’t for me’) but at the same time you’ll have seriously reliable dudes in that crop that will grow into leaders in your program. With the suburbs you have more of the demographic where the parents are keen on their kid playing football until they’re 22, regardless of where and how often they see the field.
It’s going to be a lot of push-and-pull in the program recruitment game. Have to understand how the school (specifically its location) may be perceived by different groups of high school seniors; have to know the causes of first-year attrition; have to have the wherewithal that is working with a melting pot of adults who all have different motivations for playing at yourprogram as opposed to somewhere else. Being the head man of a small college program is like being an HR administrator for a company (talent acquisition/retention; promotion/discipline; strengths, opportunities / weaknesses, threats.) X’s and O’s are ultimately secondary.
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 6:36 am
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
In an average year you MAY have 10 guys from the region that could play at that level. Some years more or less but I’d say that’s about the average. Not near enough to build a program which I’m sure they’re aware of.
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
TJ Carper would be a great hire for Rio imo. Not sure he would apply but he has the enthusiasm to build a program. Played at Marshall and has been successful everywhere he’s been.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
They should hire Coach Penrod.
He knows SE Ohio. Could build an outstanding staff. Still knows how to connect with kids.
He knows SE Ohio. Could build an outstanding staff. Still knows how to connect with kids.
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
exactly! Rio, like many small colleges in Ohio are struggling economically. This is about increasing enrollment. I doubt there will ever be an on campus stadium built. With Jackson there close, with great facilities, it doesn’t make economic sense. Makes more sense to partner with Gallia on a new field and share the facilityshai-halud wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 2:13 pmsmall college football programs make money through generating FTEsformerfcfan wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 2:02 pmOvercoming the attrition rate of incoming freshmen classes for the football program is going to be an uphill battle for this school.art_vandelay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 12:49 pm Jackson will be a great temporary home for Rio. But hopefully Rio gets a decent on-campus stadium built quick to get the program established. Could make them less of a commuter school for their students.
Also hope Rio plans on investing real money into the stadium/practice facilities. Hard to get kids psyched up to play for your college if their high school facilities were nicer than the college facilities (which I've seen from some other small colleges around).*
this is about survival, securing the scare resources that is students while the pool of possible college attendees becomes more Arakean
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2017 10:30 am
- GalliaGrad78
- SEOP
- Posts: 3236
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 11:29 pm
Re: Rio Grande Bringing Back Football
"exactly! Rio, like many small colleges in Ohio are struggling economically. This is about increasing enrollment. I doubt there will ever be an on campus stadium built. With Jackson there close, with great facilities, it doesn’t make economic sense. Makes more sense to partner with Gallia on a new field and share the facility"
That is an interesting idea!
That is an interesting idea!