warrnwarriorfan wrote:Wouldn't it be better if every school had a legitimate shot at winning the trophy based on their performance? This has probably been mentioned, but you could just take the total points earned in all of the sports that a school participates in then divide by the number of sports. The winner would be the school with the highest average finish in the sports they were in. What's wrong with that?
But this could actually discourage schools from offering sports. For example, Logan has ONE league tennis title in school history (1989) and never really been competitive. When I was in school, we won like 6 matches in three years.
I think we've finished second in the league once in the last 10 years, but for the most part, we're a bottom of the barrel finisher.
So why don't we just get rid of the sport, save money for the athletic department, and improve our all-sports trophy standing?
The rules are what they are. Two years ago Logan got screwed on a coin toss. Was it a bummer? Yes. But you agree to the rules up front. You can't change them in the middle of the game.
Look at Saturday. Logan's Trent McCort hit a hurdle in the 300m Hurdles final after running the fastest heat time in the pre-lims. He likely would have given Logan a 1-2 finish in the 300M hurdles, enough to vault them over Marietta for second. He hit a hurdle for the first time all season. Is "fair" that we lost a point in the all-sports trophy race because a kid made one mistake all season?
I think it's fair. That's the way competition works. Gallipolis is the 2nd or 3rd smallest school in the league and I think the ONLY sports they do not offer are Girls Tennis and Girls Soccer, and I don't think either counts toward the all sports trophy (not enough schools have teams). If GAHS can do it, then every other school should be able to as well.