Cambridge 48 Logan 14
Cambridge 48 Logan 14
Might be a tough one for Logan. Thoughts?
"you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Wayne Gretzky"
Michael Scott
Michael Scott
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 5341
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:12 am
- Location: the W
- Contact:
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
run away game. running clock
Winners never quit. And quitters never win! Vince Lombardi
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12910
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 20590
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Next to a lake somewhere
- Contact:
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
Who has Cambridge played?
Championship's are won in the off-season
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:59 pm
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
Are you serious raider,or do I detect some sarcasm? I doubt Logan rolls anybody this year,but I could be wrong.Not really sure how this game will come out,but if I had money on it my pick would be Cambridge.Raider6309 wrote:Logan rolls in this one
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12910
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:59 pm
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
^^^that is certainly not impressive on Cambridges part to barely beat John Glenn and then turn around and barely beat Canton South. If it was any year other than 2016 I would pick by Logan by whatever score they please. Since it is 2016, however, I'm going with Cambridge by 14.
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
JG losses were close and they destroyed 0-3 West M and Indian is 2-1.I don't think Logan will get blown out ,but I don't see them rolling either until their line plays MUCH better! Can't score from the 1 yard line with that big line.Not that it means anything this year but 3-7 Cambridge put up 31 points on Logan's 8-2 team last year
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
Until they improve there line play the Chiefs will struggle the rest of the year who is running the winter conditioning and weight lifting?
- TRENCHFOOT
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 21005
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
- Location: ChieftainCountry
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
Not sure on this one, but if the O line is still dragging, the play calling is going to have to get more creative.
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
The Chiefs need to be more physical at the point of attack and our kicking game is in need of some help!
- YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 25617
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:23 pm
- Location: WAVERLY, OHIO
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
hey gang grill up some good burgers and hot dogs. that may be the high light of Friday night. it's tough to be in this rut as tiger fans and chieftain fans. 2 communities steeped in football prowess, who are just getting torqued right now. but good luck to you'ns and the tigers.still a lot of football left to be played.
IN THE LONG GRASS BY THE WATER, SO WATCH YOUR STEP. AND LET'S GO IRONTON FIGHTING TIGERS, OHIO STATE BUCKEYES AND THE CINCINNATI BENGALS
- dazed&confused
- SEOPS HO
- Posts: 9270
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
- Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
Hey, the band is still good!
May you live in interesting times- ancient Chinese curse
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4118
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
Logan was much improved against Meigs - on both sides of the ball.
A re-worked o-line controlled the point of attack at times - ran for over 300 yards against Meigs with almost no passing attack.
The end plays at the goal line was a read option - and on film I'm guessing a better read would have at least kept the ball inside the three yard line.
Cambridge is a lot like Logan - playing a ton of youth.
BUT - they have a really good aggressive linebacking unit - all back from last season. They move the pocket well on offense and have good backs.
Another tough match-up, but if Logan keeps getting better they can be competitive.
A re-worked o-line controlled the point of attack at times - ran for over 300 yards against Meigs with almost no passing attack.
The end plays at the goal line was a read option - and on film I'm guessing a better read would have at least kept the ball inside the three yard line.
Cambridge is a lot like Logan - playing a ton of youth.
BUT - they have a really good aggressive linebacking unit - all back from last season. They move the pocket well on offense and have good backs.
Another tough match-up, but if Logan keeps getting better they can be competitive.
- doubleplay643
- S
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
I like the Chiefs in this one even though it is on the road.
Good Luck! 21-17 final score.
Good Luck! 21-17 final score.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4304
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
- Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
John Glenn isn't very good this year and Canton South has never been a real strong team. Indian Creek should be .500 or better. However, not a strong schedule for the Bobcats. They should be better this year but are a question mark. Bobcat teams tend to have lots of speed.
Logan just needs to prepare and play hard. A win is coming soon.
Logan just needs to prepare and play hard. A win is coming soon.
Have gun, will travel
- 1987chieftains
- SEOPS H
- Posts: 7593
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
- Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
i know its just stat based but, cal preps is saying
cambridge 24
logan 19
cambridge 24
logan 19
AT THE RESERVATION
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12910
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
Re: WK4 (0-3) Logan @ (3-0) Cambridge
i say logan will pull of there first win but it will be a close on
Logan- 35
Cambridge-32
Logan- 35
Cambridge-32