Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post Reply
User avatar
mattash
Site Admin
Posts: 17106
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 4:20 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by mattash »

EasternDspy wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:15 pm How did Jackson afford Hank Hill as a commentator?
Lol, he was good


"you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Wayne Gretzky"

Michael Scott
SE0PScommenter
Riding the Bench
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2022 1:38 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by SE0PScommenter »

Jackson out smarted themselves on the 2pt try. Sweeps we're working for most of the night and we thought we could catch em out


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18281
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by EasternDspy »

mattash wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:19 pm
EasternDspy wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:15 pm How did Jackson afford Hank Hill as a commentator?
Lol, he was good

He was entertaining


User avatar
mattash
Site Admin
Posts: 17106
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 4:20 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by mattash »

For sure, great game and season Jackson


"you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Wayne Gretzky"

Michael Scott
greygoose
SEOPS
Posts: 5756
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 12:15 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by greygoose »

Man I'll tell you what once again Jackson falls well short in the playoffs, and if this team couldn't do it one has to wonder if they'll be able to break through. Heck of a game and nice fighting back into this one, congrats to the seniors on a great season and great careers. Hate to place blame but I really think the Jackson coaches are going to look back at this game offensively and realize they didn't help the cause tonight.


Ironmen44
JV Team
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by Ironmen44 »

greygoose wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:22 pm Man I'll tell you what once again Jackson falls well short in the playoffs, and if this team couldn't do it one has to wonder if they'll be able to break through. Heck of a game and nice fighting back into this one, congrats to the seniors on a great season and great careers. Hate to place blame but I really think the Jackson coaches are going to look back at this game offensively and realize they didn't help the cause tonight.
Division III football is a different animal !!!!


Mulga Roadrunner
Waterboy
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by Mulga Roadrunner »

Jackson gets recruits year after year and has the best support system for any program in south east Ohio and yet can’t win a region. Something has to give there. All the talent over the years and always falls short. Has to be disappointing for the fan base.


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30818
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by Ironman92 »

EasternDspy wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:15 pm How did Jackson afford Hank Hill as a commentator?
Pretty sure he a recent JHS grad that went through school on an IEP


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30818
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by Ironman92 »

Great battle, great fight. Big game. Proud of all the kids. Kids stepped up and made some big plays.

Good luck to Bishop Watterson….excellent team


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18281
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by EasternDspy »

Ironman92 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:41 pm
EasternDspy wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:15 pm How did Jackson afford Hank Hill as a commentator?
Pretty sure he a recent JHS grad that went through school on an IEP
If you read I said he was entertaining


greygoose
SEOPS
Posts: 5756
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 12:15 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by greygoose »

Ironmen44 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:27 pm
greygoose wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:22 pm Man I'll tell you what once again Jackson falls well short in the playoffs, and if this team couldn't do it one has to wonder if they'll be able to break through. Heck of a game and nice fighting back into this one, congrats to the seniors on a great season and great careers. Hate to place blame but I really think the Jackson coaches are going to look back at this game offensively and realize they didn't help the cause tonight.
Division III football is a different animal !!!!
Yeah they're in a tough region but they're not even getting to where they're playing for the region with these teams that also can't be used as an excuse either. For me and especially with the play calling as a whole tonight the coaches squandered a golden opportunity with this team.


VetteMan
SEOPS H
Posts: 7775
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:58 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by VetteMan »

Congrats Ironmen on an outstanding season and playoff run.


Ironmen44
JV Team
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by Ironmen44 »

greygoose wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:55 pm
Ironmen44 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:27 pm
greygoose wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:22 pm Man I'll tell you what once again Jackson falls well short in the playoffs, and if this team couldn't do it one has to wonder if they'll be able to break through. Heck of a game and nice fighting back into this one, congrats to the seniors on a great season and great careers. Hate to place blame but I really think the Jackson coaches are going to look back at this game offensively and realize they didn't help the cause tonight.
Division III football is a different animal !!!!
Yeah they're in a tough region but they're not even getting to where they're playing for the region with these teams that also can't be used as an excuse either. For me and especially with the play calling as a whole tonight the coaches squandered a golden opportunity with this team.
If you want to win DIII regionals then you need to play good DII and DIII teams and not DV teams. You don’t see the size of players playing DV schools.


formerfcfan
SEOP
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
Location: Amanda, OH

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by formerfcfan »

Ironman92 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:41 pm
EasternDspy wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:15 pm How did Jackson afford Hank Hill as a commentator?
Pretty sure he a recent JHS grad that went through school on an IEP
Kudos to the guy for doing it, no matter ‘hwat. Takes stones to do play-by-play.


greygoose
SEOPS
Posts: 5756
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 12:15 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by greygoose »

Ironmen44 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:02 pm
greygoose wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:55 pm
Ironmen44 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:27 pm

Division III football is a different animal !!!!
Yeah they're in a tough region but they're not even getting to where they're playing for the region with these teams that also can't be used as an excuse either. For me and especially with the play calling as a whole tonight the coaches squandered a golden opportunity with this team.
If you want to win DIII regionals then you need to play good DII and DIII teams and not DV teams. You don’t see the size of players playing DV schools.
Are you a true Ironman poster?? There's no way because you don't even know who they play, all but 3 games were against DII and DIII schools :lol: :lol: The talent they have just isn't being taken to the next level and I'm sorry but that's on coaching, lining up foot to foot only gets you so far in the bigger divisions.


Ironmen98
All State
Posts: 1034
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:52 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by Ironmen98 »

Great season Jackson, not bad for hard nosed southern Ohio boys !


Ironmen44
JV Team
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by Ironmen44 »

greygoose wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:07 pm
Ironmen44 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:02 pm
greygoose wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:55 pm

Yeah they're in a tough region but they're not even getting to where they're playing for the region with these teams that also can't be used as an excuse either. For me and especially with the play calling as a whole tonight the coaches squandered a golden opportunity with this team.
If you want to win DIII regionals then you need to play good DII and DIII teams and not DV teams. You don’t see the size of players playing DV schools.
Are you a true Ironman poster?? There's no way because you don't even know who they play, all but 3 games were against DII and DIII schools :lol: :lol: The talent they have just isn't being taken to the next level and I'm sorry but that's on coaching, lining up foot to foot only gets you so far in the bigger divisions.
Haha I know exactly who we played. Logan is the only DII team. The DIII teams we played are not the top teams in the state. Never mind dude you know it all……


greygoose
SEOPS
Posts: 5756
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 12:15 pm

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by greygoose »

Ironmen44 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:17 pm
greygoose wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:07 pm
Ironmen44 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:02 pm

If you want to win DIII regionals then you need to play good DII and DIII teams and not DV teams. You don’t see the size of players playing DV schools.
Are you a true Ironman poster?? There's no way because you don't even know who they play, all but 3 games were against DII and DIII schools :lol: :lol: The talent they have just isn't being taken to the next level and I'm sorry but that's on coaching, lining up foot to foot only gets you so far in the bigger divisions.
Haha I know exactly who we played. Logan is the only DII team. The DIII teams we played are not the top teams in the state. Never mind dude you know it all……
That's sort of the typical response when one realizes they stepped in it. Played 2-DV schools and lost to one of them the size of the player isn't the problem. I mean Jackson's non-conference schedule featured 5 teams and 4 of which were still playing tonight to advance to regional championship game. At that point you're putting it on league play and everyone all year long has talked up how great the FAC was this season even though only 1 team got past round 1. Just not sure what you're expecting.


ironman02
SEOP
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by ironman02 »

Congrats to Jackson on another great season. Tough way to end it, but they played well against a very good team.

Good luck to the seniors as they move on. Over the last four years, this class was 36-9 at the varsity level, won 3 outright FAC titles, went to the playoffs 4 times, and was 5-4 in playoff games. Yes, it would have been nice to take the next step and win a regional title, but that's still a nice list of accomplishments and something for those guys to be proud of and remember forever.


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30818
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)

Post by Ironman92 »

EasternDspy wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:51 pm
Ironman92 wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:41 pm
EasternDspy wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:15 pm How did Jackson afford Hank Hill as a commentator?
Pretty sure he a recent JHS grad that went through school on an IEP
If you read I said he was entertaining
I thought the Hank Hill comment maybe not the best but maybe I read it the wrong way


Post Reply

Return to “Football”