Absolutely stupid rule!
And the players should have received proper education from the coaching staff regarding the rules......and they didn't!
![Mad :mad:](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
![Mad :mad:](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
![Mad :mad:](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
I agree. Herbstreit pretty much just threw Pryor under the bus on espn.whompascat wrote:i bet most of the $$$ went for beer and pizza!
Exactly, so is the NCAA going to investigate every athlete who has tattoos covering every square inch of their arms and most of their chests and legs knowing full well these kids can't afford them? If they are going to punish these 5 from Ohio State then they need to find out just how all these other athletes on every team across the nation can afford to be covered in all of the very expensive ink. You know as well as I do that they are probably doing the same thing. It's just that no one has ratted them out yet which I'm sure is what happened here. This isn't just a coincidence that all of a sudden this little tattoo parlor in the middle of nowhere gets raided and this comes to light.gahs4ever wrote:1) They "own" their own autographs.
2) Those tatoos cost several hundred to over a thousand dollars and more.
3) To exchange a signature for a free tatoo is wrong according to the NCAA is because the practice is not extended to the general public.
4) If you think not, go to you local tatoo parlor and offer your signature on a picture or football for a free tatoo.
5) It is this advantage that makes the practice wrong in the eyes of the NCAA.
6) For exactly this same reasoning, if you are a 4.0 student on scholarship (like these athletes), try finding a booster to line your pockets for thousands or cars or jobs for your relatives as a reward for your academic achievements.
Speilman called into the radio station Thursday and absolutely destroyed those involved!farmer wrote:I remember reading before that Archie Griffin said that the tie with the Team Up North that kept him from getting another pair of gold pants. That he would have traded his Heisman Trophy for it because of the meaning and pride behind the gold pants.
Getting rid of your things for something that you need is one thing just to get a tat is another. This is why when you see the Bucks play sometimes they just do not have the emotion in the way they play the game. Some of the players winning is not as important as it was during the past. Wonder what Chris Speilman's thoughts are on this.
GoBuckeyes2786 wrote:Mark May was raising hell of espn because the NCAA took it too lightly and should have suspended them for the sugar bowl. Also saying the NCAA favors the big ten and let's them off easy and that if it were Ryan mallet and Arkansas, mallet would not be playing in the sugar bowl because the NCAA comes down harder on sec schools and favors the big ten and pac 10 lol..... This being said after Ohio state take a hit (big ten) and USC gets raped (PAC 10) and cam newton is still playing in the bcs title (sec) ... Am I the only one missing something here? Lol