Your Opinion? President Guilty Of Treason?

[kantuckyII]

This man makes a compelling argument that Obama is actually guilty of treason. After....."after" you read the article, what is your opinion? Is Obama guilty treason? And if so, what action should be taken against him?

. Weekend Edition: IT WAS TREASON – Arrest Obama

Last Thursday, I wrote an article titled, “Obama & Libya – A Case Study in Treason” and in that article I stated, “When a president fails to lift a finger to protect Americans, at home or abroad, in the face of overwhelming intelligence and evidence, by ignoring obvious warning signs and the advice of those entrusted to offer such protection…”

“It is treason.”

I meant every word and yes, I am well aware of the weight of the word, “treason.”

I do not nor have I ever used it lightly. I see that word bandied about on social media and while I understand full well the passion of those who use it, I rarely, if ever, believe that the issues to which it is applied, truly rise to that level.

This situation, in Libya, I am convinced…Does.

To explain, let’s first look at the legal definition and it’s context within our Constitution.

Definition of Treason in the Constitution:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

Legal Definition of Treason:

The betrayal of one’s own country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid its enemies.

Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution:

Any person who levies war against the United States or adheres to its enemies by giving them Aid and Comfort has committed treason within the meaning of the Constitution. The term aid and comfort refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given.

Day by day…Nearly hour by hour, we learn more about what transpired in Benghazi on 9-11-12.

Yesterday, we learned a truly horrific truth.


As the first shots rang out at our Consulate, the calls for help, coming from the “safe” annex were sent to Washington.

Not once.

Not twice.

Three times, Tyrone Woods and a CIA operative, at the annex, called for help and asked permission to go TO the Consulate to offer assistance…To fight.

Washington denied them.

Not once.

Not twice.

Three times, Washington denied them help or permission to join the fight.

After the third denial, Ex Navy Seal, Tyrone Woods, went against the direct order to stand down and, he stood up.

Tyrone Woods went to the Consulate defying a direct order and he got as many of our personnel out of there as he could…Including the body of State Department officer Sean Smith.

Tyrone Woods could not find Ambassador Stevens.

Tyrone Woods took those he rescued and the body of Mr. Smith back to the annex where he was joined shortly after by Glen Doherty, another Ex Navy Seal who had just arrived from Tripoli.

A few hours later, that annex came under fire from terrorists now believed to be Ansar al-Sharia, a well known affiliate of al Qaeda.

We also learned yesterday that Woods and Doherty were on the roof of the annex and from their vantage point, could see the position of the mortars being fired at them. They “painted” that position with a laser used to guide weapons from military aircraft.

Military aircraft that were not coming to help.

Those aircraft, from Italy, which could have included Blackhawk helicopters and a C-130 gunship, had also been ordered, from Washington, to stand down.

For those unfamiliar with a C-130 gunship, it is one of the most feared weapons in our military. The C-130 is specifically designed for close air support roles include supporting ground troops, escorting convoys, and flying urban operations. Air interdiction missions are conducted against planned targets and targets of opportunity. Force protection missions include defending bases and other facilities.

As far as the enemy is concerned…When a C-130 gunship comes into the picture…Hell comes with it.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta spoke on Thursday and, as a reason for NOT sending help, stated: “The basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on, without having some real-time information about what’s taking place. And as a result of not having that kind of information…[we] felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

The problem is this.

We DID have real-time information. Those in the State Department were literally watching the terrorist attack happen live via video link AND we had what we now know were 2 unmanned drones over the attack site in Benghazi. If that’s not enough, at the annex, less than a mile away, we had a Navy Seal, Tyrone Woods AND a CIA operative.

By the time the second wave of the attack began, at the annex, we had the CIA operative and 2 Navy Seals, Woods and Doherty and THEY were “painting” the position of the mortar launches with a laser used to guide the very weapons that a Blackhawk or C-130 could have brought to bear.

If that’s not enough, our military is the most highly trained military on earth. Those who fly those ships of war train each and every day for exactly the sort of eventually that was transpiring that night in Benghazi. Their very job is to go into harm’s way.

Combined…all of this lays waste to Panetta’s explanation and reduces it to nothing but a bald faced, unadulterated lie.

Back to treason.

For an act of treason to occur, a state of war must exist.

We are indeed at war. In Afghanistan, we are currently engaged in war against al Qaeda. Ansar al-Sharia IS a well-known al Qaeda affiliate and Ansar al-Sharia was attacking our consulate and annex, both considered American soil.

For an act of treason to be committed, one must manifest a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information.

There are some 20,000 shoulder fired rockets, RPG’s and other heavy weapons MISSING that were provided to Libyan rebels in the attempt to oust Gaddafi from power. We didn’t know WHO those rebels were at the time we armed them and, in fact, within hours of Gaddafi’s death, the flags of al Qaeda were flying in Benghazi.

Furthermore, in cables from security personnel in the months leading up TO the fatal attack, it was clearly stated that those al Qaeda flags were still flying over several government buildings in Benghazi.

Also, regarding an act of treason, If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given.

The order for Navy Seal Tyrone Wood to stand down, the orders to our military in Italy to stand down and the repeated…not once…Not twice but…Three denials of help from Washington does, by any definition, equate to a “weakening of the power to resist its enemies.”

During the 2nd debate, when a question regarding Libya was posed, Obama responded:

“Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job but, she works for Me. I’m the president. I’m always responsible.”

The State Department was watching the attack live, in real-time.

Emails were sent to some 400 people in Washington DURING the attack, in real-time.

Among the recipients of those emails was the White House Situation room.

At the time those emails arrived at the White House Situation Room, Obama was meeting with his Security Team.

Obama says that HE is the president and HE is responsible.

I am sensing a very, very…VERY short chain of command here.

The calls for help from the CIA operative and Tyrone Woods were NOT ignored and did NOT go unanswered. The requests to enter the fight from bases in Italy were NOT ignored and did NOT go unanswered.

All were DENIED.

That shows a purposeful action.

All of those calls for help and requests for deployment were DENIED purposefully.

The result was that our enemy, those conducting the operation against our Consulate, our annex, our assets and our personnel in Benghazi, was aided…AIDED…by a purposeful lack of response…DIRECTED FROM THE HIGHEST LEVELS IN WASHINGTON.

Our Consulate in Benghazi was destroyed while Washington officials watched, received emails and denied calls for help in real-time.

4 Americans were killed while Washington officials watched, received emails and denied calls for help in real-time.

Whatever confidential papers or records contained in that Consulate were either destroyed or went missing while Washington officials watched, received emails and denied calls for help in real-time.

“…such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or CLASSIFIED INFORMATION…”

Who?

Who gave the willful and purposeful order to deny help when Navy Seal Tyrone Woods called?

Who?

Who gave the willful and purposeful order for Tyrone Woods and the CIA Operative to Stand Down?

Who?

Who gave the willful and purposeful order for our highly trained, apt and heavily armed military in Italy to stand down?

Who?

“Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job but, she works for ME. I’m the president. I’m always responsible.”

For the very life of me, I cannot conjure a single conclusion other than treason, brought about by political cowardice, for denying help not once, not twice but, three times in the midst of a terrorist attack and not one reason but treason, brought about by political cowardice, for the willful and purposeful order to those in a position to offer needed help in the midst of a terrorist attack, to stand down.

2 quotes come to mind. The first, from Marcus Tullius Cicero, describes the sort of man who would issue orders not to send help and for Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty to stand down in the face of the attack.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

And the second, from John15:13, is the precise description of the last hours and minutes of the lives of Woods and Doherty.

“Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”

Ultimately, only one person could have issued the orders not to help and for the military not to deploy.

Only one. Barack Obama.

Will ANY Member of Congress show the moral clarity and courage of Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty? Will ANY Member of Congress stand AGAINST political cowardice and call this what it was?

An Act of Treason.

Craig Andresen

The National Patriot

Weekend Edition 10/27/12

[ironmen1987]

Bill Clinton told Hillary To Resign, US Arming ‘Syrian Rebels’ With Ties To Al Queda
By Rebecca Diserio on Oct 24, 2012 in 2012 Election News, exposing Obama, Featured, Politics, World News


Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, came forward to “take responsibility overall” for the attacks at Benghazi, but per Ed Klein we now know behind the scenes Bill Clinton advised his wife to resign over the possible criminal fallout of the Benghazi massacre. Today we learn from sources that not only did Hillary ask for added security, and was denied, but her closest advisers strongly suggested she seek legal counsel just days after the attack. Why? Why did “they” deny Hillary’s requests for added security to Benghazi, and why is this a situation in which a Secretary of State would need personal legal counsel? Could the Benghazi fallout, go beyond what a Public Relations firm can handle? I’d say YES. Could this be a criminal act, negligence, dereliction of duty, which resulted in murder? I’d say YES. And I’d say that Hillary is telling the truth as the “source” of these latest developments come straight from her “legal counsel”. Hillary did prior to September 11th, 2012 order added security for Benghazi, and those requests were denied—but by who?

To fully understand what happened in Benghazi, we need to step back. Ambassador Stevens was located in a CIA safehouse (otherwise known as the building burned down during attack)–that location is where on the night of the attack he dined with the Turkish General Counsel. Why? Why was Stevens meeting with this Turkish official? Apparently, in reports the US was gun running weapons through Turkey to aid the Syrian Rebels, but the real kicker here is that we handed over 400 tons in one shipment, to Al Queda and the Muslim Brotherhood, who are the leaders of these so called “Syrian Rebels”. We can speculate what the Turkish General Counsel talked with Ambassador Stevens about that night—but what is clear is that the Al Queda backed forces were on scene whilst the two men dined.

The ‘Libyan forces’ called the Feb. 17th Brigade, were the extra security which manned that CIA safe house. On the night of the attack, Sean Smith, sent this message via a gaming app

”Assuming we don’t die tonight. We saw one of our ‘police’ that guard the compound taking pictures.”

What is interesting to note here, is the quotations around the word police. Here, he is referring to the Feb. 17th Brigade, and what it tells me is he is questioning just who these ‘police’ are with, why are they casing the safe house taking pictures? We now know that this “Brigade” is an affiliate of Al Queda and they fought under the “Black Flag” of Al Queda. Diana West, an expert in Middle East affairs has this to offer:

The Obama administration, however, threw in Uncle Sam’s lot with bad guys – the “rebels,” the “martyrs,” the Muslim Brothers, the whole jihad-happy crew in Libya and the wider Middle East. Uncle Sam, more or less, crossed to the “other side.” It is this alliance or support for “martyrs” and their sympathizers in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and Syria that is the betrayal from which Benghazi-gate rises, particularly as our veterans’ cemeteries and hospitals are filled with casualties caused by such “martyrs.”

Let’s cut to the chase. Benghazi is shaping up to be the worst cover-up ever in the history of the US. The 12 reports that were filed within the first 24 hours, outlining to the White House exactly what had transpired, never once mention a “protest” or any “video”. They do mention Al Queda linked group called Ansar al-Sharia, claiming the attacks. We know that the drone was feeding live video back to the White house “situation room” and that Obama was in a meeting with Panetta and Biden at the White House—we know they were informed via those emails of the attack in progress. Is there any doubt they also were watching this live in real time?

And with that info, Obama strolled out to the Rose Garden, and alluded to this “video”. In later appearances Obama does talk about the “vile” video, slamming Romney for calling it a “terrorist” attack. The DOJ indicts and arrests a man, albeit with a shady past—but does his family deserve having a price on their head—do they deserve to never return to their home, due to danger? Does he deserve to be in protective custody due to death threats from Muslim extremists? Do the 4 dead Americans, and their families, deserve any of what has gone on?

America stands at the crossroads in history. The Main Stream Media is protecting Obama, so many Americans do not know these details. They are hoping to slide through the next 2 weeks and pull out a victory, putting back in power the President who watched our fellow Americans die….and then, went to bed

[kantuckyII]

Could you have imagined if George Bush would have done something like this? That is all CNN would be running every day all day long.

What is really scary to me is if Obama actually pulls this off being reelected, and then this continues to hit the limelight, we are faced with impeaching the president and removing him from office. How this will tear the fabric of our nation even further apart! How I wish that people would vote for Romney and remove this man from office without issue. I hope their eyes will be open soon

[C-Bolt]

If they didn't impeach Bush for that mess in Iraq where hundreds of thousands people including thousands of americans lost there lives over the guise of WMDS and CHEMICALS WEAPONS not even there, they won't impeach OBAMA over a few Americans lost

[kantuckyII]

It is apparent that you did not read the article. So please refrain from commenting any further

[C-Bolt]

Nothing wrong with my reading if you want everybody agreeing with your distorted views then have it!

[NYBuckeye96]

C-bolt hit the nail on the head! What a bunch of verbal diarrhea!

[kantuckyII]

Not to mention you still do not understand. Saddam Hussein had not followed that clear dictate by the United Nations to reveal what he had done with his WMD's. That is the reason that George Bush enjoyed such a large coalition of Nations during the invasion and removal of Hussein from office. Even Hussein's top people had stated that Saddam tried his best to give the impression that he still had lots of WMD's. The reason for this smoke cloud was, in his view, it would help deter an attack by Iran on Iraq. A country which they had been with in war with for many years.

[C-Bolt]

come on you know better that was daddy's war all the way he was trying to clean up,at least daddy was smart enough to not send land troops into bagdad

[kantuckyII]

C-bolt hit the nail on the head! What a bunch of verbal diarrhea!

You can continue to throw your verbiage out there. However, this is not going to go away. This is the same serious issue as a Watergate. With every day that goes by, and with every piece of new information that comes out about this, it continues to the back up the suspicion and accusations that there was a strong dereliction of duty by this administration and then a continual and on going cover-up.

You can bet your bottom dollar that Obama is scared to death over this. That is the reason that they continue to push for early voting. He wants as many people to vote for him as possible before the truth continues to trickle out.

[NYBuckeye96]

Isn't it ironic that kantucky asks "Your Opinion?" in the title to the thread and then when someone doesn't agree with him, he goes on the attack. I agree with C-bolt 100%.

[C-Bolt]

Okay I'll quit now you and your cronies who agree can have at it over this horrible president who can't do nothing right

[C-Bolt]

Isn't it ironic that kantucky asks "Your Opinion?" in the title to the thread and then when someone doesn't agree with him, he goes on the attack. I agree with C-bolt 100%.

Yeah I actually thought he might agree with me over that one sorry I'm now down screwing your thread up tuck

[kantuckyII]

come on you know better that was daddy's war all the way he was trying to clean up,at least daddy was smart enough to not send land troops into bagdad

He is not my dad. But yet he was so much more honorable than Barack Obama it is not even funny.

I'm telling you right now. Mark my words! Obama's mess up early last year in the removal of Momar Qaddafi is going to come back and haunt us in a horrible manner. This administration allowed terrorist to gain and run off with thousands of surface-to-air missiles. Where they are at right now is anybody's guess. They should have been destroyed early on by American forces to keep them from falling in terrorist hands. For all we know right now, they could have made their way into this country by the dozens and could be used by terrorist groups in an organized manner in the very future. We are liable to find ourselves hearing the news one afternoon where 100 commercial airlines are shot down in one day all around the country

[kantuckyII]

Isn't it ironic that kantucky asks "Your Opinion?" in the title to the thread and then when someone doesn't agree with him, he goes on the attack. I agree with C-bolt 100%.

I asked an opinion after reading the article. Did you read the article? Trust me, there is a reason why the military strongly is going to be backing Romney In the elections, they do not trust their current Commander-in-Chief. And I assume, if you are like so many of them and your lives on the line everyday, that takes on a whole new urgency

[kantuckyII]

From an article that appeared online yesterday;

The battle-hardened veterans of the military favor Mitt Romney over Barack Obama by a huge margin, 66% to 22%, according to an October poll conducted by the Military Times -- and the two issues most important to the voters were the economy and the character of the candidate. 66% of respondents said that either the economy or the character of the candidate was the deciding issue

.

[Bear]

Brietbart? The National Patriot? Really?

[noreply66]

Yes President George W. is guilty

[Bear]

The no bid contracts should have been looked at. Along with the disbanding of the Iraqi military shortly after we took Baghdad. We took a ton of jobs away from their populas and gave it to contractors, its no wonder they were in a state of cival war for a while there.

[kantuckyII]

Well, this thread is getting like so many liberal news sources. We have wandered away from the topic at hand. There is a smokescreen being laid down and in the end we blame it all on George Bush