IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

southernohio13
Freshman Team
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:07 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by southernohio13 »

shouldn't the waverly coaches reminded their kids NOOOOOOOOOO timeouts???? Oh my.. what a way to lose another game. Sounded like a good game.


smurray
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9902
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:52 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by smurray »

Everyone from Waverly should have been reminded of NO timeouts but kids do crazy things in the heat of the moment. Chris Webber did it and he was much older.


southernohio13
Freshman Team
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:07 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by southernohio13 »

true but still no excuse. i would be absolutely sick if i were a waverly fan! This team has lost way too many games when you have kids like Kretzer and martin.


hbk2016
Varsity
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:19 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by hbk2016 »

southernohio13,

who are you a fan of, you seem very critical of Piketon and Waverly


4thgoal
SEOPS
Posts: 6437
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Wheelersburg

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by 4thgoal »

smurray wrote:Losing these 1, 2, 3 point games is getting rediculous. This team could be 12-2. If they start figuring out how to win them they could be dangerous.
Agreed....if they get it together by the tournament, they could make some noise. If I was a coach, I wouldn't want to get them early in the tournament. What do the Waverly faithful feel is the issue this year? Is it coaching or what? I have my opinion, but it is only based on the 2 times I saw them vs. Burg.


ItownHosscat
S
Posts: 1916
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:31 pm

Re: IRONTON VS WAVERLY - UPDATES

Post by ItownHosscat »

smurray wrote:I heard Ironton missed the shot and Kretzer got the rebound. They were hacking Jake to force the FT's but weren't getting the call. A Waverly player made a mistake and called the timeout.

They werent trying to foul,the ball was loose and they were battling for it,the another player called timeout.
A needed win for the Fighting Tigers.


Hitchbone64
All Conference
Posts: 990
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:09 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by Hitchbone64 »

Any stats from the game from both sides


ItownHosscat
S
Posts: 1916
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:31 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL

Post by ItownHosscat »

danicalifornia wrote:If there is only a second left and you're winning, just throw the ball high in the air and just launch it down court, whatever you can do to not call a timeout. What an awful way to lose a game.
Hard to do when theres 3-4 kids trying to get a hold of the ball.


southernohio13
Freshman Team
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:07 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by southernohio13 »

hbk, only stating the facts and critical of teams that have been critical to other teams in the area. What goes around, comes around..... good night!


southernohio13
Freshman Team
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:07 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by southernohio13 »

4th n Goal wrote:
smurray wrote:Losing these 1, 2, 3 point games is getting rediculous. This team could be 12-2. If they start figuring out how to win them they could be dangerous.
Agreed....if they get it together by the tournament, they could make some noise. If I was a coach, I wouldn't want to get them early in the tournament. What do the Waverly faithful feel is the issue this year? Is it coaching or what? I have my opinion, but it is only based on the 2 times I saw them vs. Burg.
Just curious? what is your opinion?


southernohio13
Freshman Team
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:07 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by southernohio13 »

Now that all of that is off my chest, lol... I will root for all the teams from this area as long as we have no more stupid comments from fans on/off this forum if you know what i mean...
Last edited by southernohio13 on Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Hitchbone64
All Conference
Posts: 990
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:09 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by Hitchbone64 »

smurray wrote:Everyone from Waverly should have been reminded of NO timeouts but kids do crazy things in the heat of the moment. Chris Webber did it and he was much older.
Murray, I was just telling my son the same thing. The natural instinct and coached teaching is to get possession of the ball. The heat of the moment in a big road game easily can get in the way. No one play wins or losses a game in it's totality, yet everyone will remember this.

What is lost in the lose is Waverly must have played a solid game against Ironton. I thought Irontons guard pressure would hurt the young guards from Waverly.


tiger_balla
Freshman Team
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:27 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by tiger_balla »

T ough loss for Tigers ! Great effort and very unfortunate situation at end of OT and player made mistake by calling TO with the tigers out ot TO'S. Question is why would coaching staff call TO with 12 seconds after taking lead. Ironton out of TO I think.
Anyhow, great effort by Tigers!


lebasketball22
Waterboy
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:48 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by lebasketball22 »

The timeout was called with 12 seconds because a breakaway layup was made by Waverly and the floor balance was extremely into Irontons favor. They could have thrown the ball in and pushed it up the floor for an easy layup. I thought that was a great call by Coach Robertson given the situation and the balance of the floor.


User avatar
Mad-Dogg
SEOP
Posts: 4161
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:34 pm
Location: Wheelersburg Oh home of the 2x State Champs, 8x Regional Champs and 34x SOC Div 2 Champs
Contact:

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by Mad-Dogg »

smurray wrote:Everyone from Waverly should have been reminded of NO timeouts but kids do crazy things in the heat of the moment. Chris Webber did it and he was much older.
I don't think webber was much older wasn't he only a freshman at michigan?


caglewis
SEOP
Posts: 3813
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:39 am

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by caglewis »

From the Ironton Tribune:
http://www.irontontribune.com/2011/01/3 ... -ot-71-70/

Waverly 9 14 17 20 10 = 70

Ironton 20 4 17 19 11 = 71

WAVERLY (6-8): Devin Kelly 0 2 0-0 6, Taylor Ward 3 0 1-2 7, Jean Paul White 0 2 2-2 6, Jake Kretzer 7 5 4-4 33, Harrison Martin 8 0 0-2 16, Davis Remy 0 0 0-0 0. Totals: 27-57 7-10 70. Fouls: 14. Fouled out: None. 3-point goals: 9-25. Rebounds: 10 offense, 20 defense = 30 (Kretzer 13, Martin 8). Assists: 15 (Kretzer 7). Steals:5 (Kretzer 2). Turnovers: 10.

IRONTON (9-5): Malcolm Morton 1 0 0-1 2, Travis Elliott 8 0 4-7 20, Zac Carter 1 5 6-6 23, Trevor White 4 0 0-0 8, Trey Fletcher 3 2 2-2 14, Nick Culbertson 1 0 0-0 2, Josh Glover 1 0 0-0 2, Tanner Schweickart 0 0 0-0 0, Nolan Johnson 0 0 0-0 0. Totals: 26-49 12-16 71. Fouls: 12. Fouled out: None. 3-point goals: 7-17. Rebounds: 6 offense, 17 defense = 23 (White 7, Fletcher 6, Carter 5). Assists: 15 (Morton 7, Carter 4). Steals: 7 (White 2, Morton 2). Turnovers: 13.


User avatar
SOCFAN1430
Varsity
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:24 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by SOCFAN1430 »

They werent trying to foul,the ball was loose and they were battling for it,the another player called timeout.
A needed win for the Fighting Tigers.[/quote]

How can a player call a timeout without possession


ItownHosscat
S
Posts: 1916
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:31 pm

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by ItownHosscat »

The Waverly player may of had possession of the ball at the time,My response was to the person saying to throw the ball into the air,the ball was loose on the floor Ironton and Waverly were battling for it.The kid called a timeout,the refs explained it to the coach.The kid from Waverly that came up with the ball,told his coach he didn't call a timeout and they(refs)said no it was another kid,and that kid told the coach he did infact call timeout.
Ups and downs by both teams,but all an all great game.


Ace
Freshman Team
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:46 pm

Re: IRONTON VS WAVERLY - UPDATES

Post by Ace »

ItownHosscat wrote:They werent trying to foul,the ball was loose and they were battling for it,the another player called timeout.
How can you call a timeout during a loose ball?


User avatar
eagles73Taylor
SE
Posts: 2479
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:18 pm
Location: Piketon, Ohio

Re: IRONTON 71 VS Waverly 70 - FINAL - 1 OT

Post by eagles73Taylor »

You have to remember, it takes a second for the kid to call it, and a split second for the ref to react and blow the whistle and indicate the call. The call goes when the ref recognizes it, not when the whistle blows. Hard loss.


Post Reply

Return to “Boys Basketball”