D4 Scores and Updates 2022

Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30828
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by Ironman92 »

bbjunky81 wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 5:13 pm
art_vandelay wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 4:37 pm What a joke.*
Agreed. Putting Webster at #7 tells me that way too many of these coaches don’t scout other teams and vote solely on record and nothing else.

Federal Hocking and Symmes would be the worst or second worst team in the SOC 2.. Symmes played the #3 team in the SOC 2 in Valley and lost by 30+, would have been near 50 if Valley didn’t pull starters early. Fairfield also lost to Valley by 30. Webster split with Valley lol.

No respect but not surprising. Howie got the cakewalk he wanted and Valley + South Webster + Fairfield who all play strong schedules got hosed.
Man you know they get a path they see as best and plug in teams….making it close with records. Those same teams move every potential difficult game until after the draw….even though they only have a few tougher games.

It’s 100% garbage that Valley and South Webster meet up that early. No idea why the SE district doesn’t care that this happens often.


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30828
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by Ironman92 »

Federal Hocking’s best wins? Who did they lose to?

I know lost to Fairland 81-38

Beat Waterford twice? Who is Waterford’s best win?


User avatar
93Bulldog
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 14441
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:01 am
Location: Southeastern Ohio
Contact:

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by 93Bulldog »

Federal Hocking beat Waterford (12-5) twice.
FH killed Alexander 78-51 (who beat your Ironmen, btw ... lol)
FH scored more points against Athens than any other team all year. 70-53 W

Athens opponents (score)

Columbus Briggs 46
Marietta 49
Gallia 50
Circleville 34
Meigs 47
NY 47
VC 55
Wellston 32
Jackson 39
Federal Hocking 70
Warren 48
Alexander 39
Logan 47
Wellston 67 (OT)
Vinton 46
Meigs 61

Federal Hocking (15-3) lost to D2 Morgan by 2, D3 Fairland and D2 Marietta.

The Lancers are a good team, I personally think they may have a little less "talent" than last year, but play WAY BETTER as a "TEAM".


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6553
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

What a joke. Hopefully the Jeeps get pissed off and roll through everyone


Beatin the brakes off em in the thunderdome
Game count 2023 : 54
Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30828
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by Ironman92 »

93Bulldog wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:34 pm Federal Hocking beat Waterford (12-5) twice.
FH killed Alexander 78-51 (who beat your Ironmen, btw ... lol)
FH scored more points against Athens than any other team all year. 70-53 W

Athens opponents (score)

Columbus Briggs 46
Marietta 49
Gallia 50
Circleville 34
Meigs 47
NY 47
VC 55
Wellston 32
Jackson 39
Federal Hocking 70
Warren 48
Alexander 39
Logan 47
Wellston 67 (OT)
Vinton 46
Meigs 61

Federal Hocking (15-3) lost to D2 Morgan by 2, D3 Fairland and D2 Marietta.

The Lancers are a good team, I personally think they may have a little less "talent" than last year, but play WAY BETTER as a "TEAM".
Your Burrow write up was way better man


JC2124
Varsity
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:34 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by JC2124 »

Ironman92 wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:06 pm
93Bulldog wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:34 pm Federal Hocking beat Waterford (12-5) twice.
FH killed Alexander 78-51 (who beat your Ironmen, btw ... lol)
FH scored more points against Athens than any other team all year. 70-53 W

Athens opponents (score)

Columbus Briggs 46
Marietta 49
Gallia 50
Circleville 34
Meigs 47
NY 47
VC 55
Wellston 32
Jackson 39
Federal Hocking 70
Warren 48
Alexander 39
Logan 47
Wellston 67 (OT)
Vinton 46
Meigs 61

Federal Hocking (15-3) lost to D2 Morgan by 2, D3 Fairland and D2 Marietta.

The Lancers are a good team, I personally think they may have a little less "talent" than last year, but play WAY BETTER as a "TEAM".
Your Burrow write up was way better man
What’s Trimbles best win? One could argue that they shouldn’t be the 1 seed based off quality wins. I think we could have a better bracket if the southeast district would let this forum make the bracket lol. We are blessed with some really knowledgeable posters….and some real homers too.


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30828
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by Ironman92 »

JC2124 wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:23 pm
Ironman92 wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:06 pm
93Bulldog wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:34 pm Federal Hocking beat Waterford (12-5) twice.
FH killed Alexander 78-51 (who beat your Ironmen, btw ... lol)
FH scored more points against Athens than any other team all year. 70-53 W

Athens opponents (score)

Columbus Briggs 46
Marietta 49
Gallia 50
Circleville 34
Meigs 47
NY 47
VC 55
Wellston 32
Jackson 39
Federal Hocking 70
Warren 48
Alexander 39
Logan 47
Wellston 67 (OT)
Vinton 46
Meigs 61

Federal Hocking (15-3) lost to D2 Morgan by 2, D3 Fairland and D2 Marietta.

The Lancers are a good team, I personally think they may have a little less "talent" than last year, but play WAY BETTER as a "TEAM".
Your Burrow write up was way better man
What’s Trimbles best win? One could argue that they shouldn’t be the 1 seed based off quality wins. I think we could have a better bracket if the southeast district would let this forum make the bracket lol. We are blessed with some really knowledgeable posters….and some real homers too.
I was just giving bulldog crap as he jabbed at me

I didn’t know who FH had lost to other than Fairland. Knew they hadn’t played Trimble yet.

I look forward to making my first ever trip to Fed Hock High School, one of the few I’ve never been to.


PHStide
Waterboy
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:29 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by PHStide »

My prediction
Trimble vs Western

Valley vs Fairfield

Trimble vs Valley

Valley


User avatar
93Bulldog
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 14441
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:01 am
Location: Southeastern Ohio
Contact:

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by 93Bulldog »

Trimble best win was 65-51 win over Caldwell without Bryce Downs in the lineup.

Thanks for the article compliment,I92. I didn't even know you were on Facebook, glad you saw it. lol


FIDO
S
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:02 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by FIDO »

There are some really smart people making the selections.😎😎😎🙄🙄


User avatar
93Bulldog
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 14441
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:01 am
Location: Southeastern Ohio
Contact:

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by 93Bulldog »

PHStide wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:51 pm My prediction
Trimble vs Western

Valley vs Fairfield

Trimble vs Valley

Valley
Give me a March Madness type bracket

(1) Trimble vs (5) Fed Hock
(7) South Webster vs (6) Fairfield

(1) Trimble vs (7) South Webster

(1) Trimble


JC2124
Varsity
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:34 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by JC2124 »

Ironman92 wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:43 pm
JC2124 wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:23 pm
Ironman92 wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:06 pm

Your Burrow write up was way better man
What’s Trimbles best win? One could argue that they shouldn’t be the 1 seed based off quality wins. I think we could have a better bracket if the southeast district would let this forum make the bracket lol. We are blessed with some really knowledgeable posters….and some real homers too.
I was just giving bulldog crap as he jabbed at me

I didn’t know who FH had lost to other than Fairland. Knew they hadn’t played Trimble yet.

I look forward to making my first ever trip to Fed Hock High School, one of the few I’ve never been to.
They had some growing pains early in the season. I think they are a solid group that really tried to upgrade the non-conference schedule. I feel that Trimble and Valley are the 2 best teams. I expect they will give Trimble their best test of the year.

It’s a great place to watch a game. Should be a great atmosphere for sure.


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6553
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

Webster lost to the #2 seed at home by 6… tied up with 1:20 to play and then beat the #2 seed on their court… and the coaches really said nah you’re 7th.


Beatin the brakes off em in the thunderdome
Game count 2023 : 54
bbjunky81
SEO
Posts: 2889
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:30 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by bbjunky81 »

The Ghost of Swanker wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:38 am Webster lost to the #2 seed at home by 6… tied up with 1:20 to play and then beat the #2 seed on their court… and the coaches really said nah you’re 7th.
Welcome to the wonderful world of SEO Tournament Coach Voting.

If anyone truly believes Symmes Valley is better than South Webster then I legitimately don't even know what to say to you.


Watching SE Ohio basketball
User avatar
93Bulldog
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 14441
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:01 am
Location: Southeastern Ohio
Contact:

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by 93Bulldog »

The Ghost of Swanker wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:38 am Webster lost to the #2 seed at home by 6… tied up with 1:20 to play and then beat the #2 seed on their court… and the coaches really said nah you’re 7th.
That's what happens with super sectionals, teams are too spread out and coaches don't sit down and dissect schedules, scores, etc ...


Fan of the youth
Freshman Team
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:21 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by Fan of the youth »

Valley defeated the Div III number one seed then in the rematch lost a lead late and ended the season with a split. Good enough to earn Valley a 2 seed in D IV.


Space Between
Waterboy
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 1:46 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by Space Between »

Fan of the youth wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:48 am Valley defeated the Div III number one seed then in the rematch lost a lead late and ended the season with a split. Good enough to earn Valley a 2 seed in D IV.
SW also split with the #1 seed in d3


art_vandelay
SE
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:53 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by art_vandelay »

Fan of the youth wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:48 am Valley defeated the Div III number one seed then in the rematch lost a lead late and ended the season with a split. Good enough to earn Valley a 2 seed in D IV.
And Webster also split with the number one seed in Division 3. Good enough to earn Webster a 7 seed in D4!

Seriously, Webster had 6 total games against Waverly (#1 seed in D2); Minford (#1 seed in D3); and Valley (#2 seed in D4). They went 2-4 in those games. Other losses were to Burg and West on road (middle of pack D3 schools). I get records have to count for something in seedings, but so does strength of schedule. Webster as a 7 seed in D4 is a joke.*


Fan of the youth
Freshman Team
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:21 pm

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by Fan of the youth »

I agree SW is better than a 7 seed. I thought Valley and SW would meet again but much later.


transplant
SE
Posts: 2244
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:52 am

Re: SEO D4 Rankings

Post by transplant »

Me too. Ball don't lie though, it will work itself out I think. Will be some very good games in D4.


Post Reply

Return to “Boys Basketball”