Valley at South Webster?

coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5482
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by coop »

63-53 FINAL


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6553
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

63-53 South Webster wins it.


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6553
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

Stats

SW
Cook 19
Loop 19
Goddard 11
Swords 10
Sutton 4

Valley
Yates 20
Dwyer 7
Keller 9
Something, Rodger mumbled it up


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6553
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

SW 43% 23/54 shooting
Valley 43% as well

5/17 3's Webster
4/18 3's Valley

12/19 Webster from the line
15/20 Valley from the line

29/28 Rebounds in favor of Webster

Turnovers
Webster 9
Valley 20


coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5482
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by coop »

Swanker Pine wrote:SW 43% 23/54 shooting
Valley 43% as well

5/17 3's Webster
4/18 3's Valley

12/19 Webster from the line
15/20 Valley from the line

29/28 Rebounds in favor of Webster

Turnovers
Webster 9
Valley 20
Looks like the difference in the ballgame.....everything else looks very close.


CharlieHustle
All Conference
Posts: 906
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:06 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by CharlieHustle »

How did Coach Rolfe choose to play today? Did he rotate a lot and give key players some rest, or did he play to win?


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6553
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

Starters up until about 30 seconds to go it sounded like.


coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5482
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by coop »

Swanker Pine wrote:Starters up until about 30 seconds to go it sounded like.
Talked to a buddy that went...Valley played all regular players, and seemed to play lethargic and sloppy. Dunno if they had the right mindset, but the regular players did play.

Dont take anything away from the Jeeps, they played well and did what they needed to do.


biggdowgg
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9033
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:44 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by biggdowgg »

I went to see this game and for such a good game by 2 good teams it just seemed so boring LOL Iguess thats what you get when evrything has already been decided on the leagues and playoffs a couple days away, and it wasnt just me I sit in tp row in upper section and you could hear what fans was saying on the other side...it really was a pretty good game, glad both teams got out with no injurys,good luck


User avatar
93Bulldog
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 14441
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:01 am
Location: Southeastern Ohio
Contact:

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by 93Bulldog »

biggdowgg wrote:I went to see this game and for such a good game by 2 good teams it just seemed so boring LOL Iguess thats what you get when evrything has already been decided on the leagues and playoffs a couple days away, and it wasnt just me I sit in tp row in upper section and you could hear what fans was saying on the other side...it really was a pretty good game, glad both teams got out with no injurys,good luck
Your just spoiled from Watching Portsmouth the last two seasons Biggdoggie!


User avatar
fan_of_swankerpine
Freshman Team
Posts: 201
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:47 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by fan_of_swankerpine »

Swanker Pine wrote:Stats

SW
Cook 19
Loop 19
Goddard 11
Swords 10
Sutton 4

Valley
Yates 20
Dwyer 7
Keller 9
Something, Rodger mumbled it up
The scoreboard showed that Loop had 20 and Cook had 18.


Jeep-ster
Freshman Team
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:27 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by Jeep-ster »

Anyone know the JV ref who threatened to throw out the entire home side? PM me if so, a buddy wanted to know. :)


sparky
All State
Posts: 1491
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 11:00 am

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by sparky »

did that loss cost valley a golden ball?


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6553
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

They clinched that last week


smurray
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9902
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:52 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by smurray »

The loss to Waverly cost them the golden ball.


coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5482
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by coop »

smurray wrote:The loss to Waverly cost them the golden ball.
What? Valley climched the outright SOC title last tuesday when they beat Minford and Waverly lost to Burg.


User avatar
TheNatural
Riding the Bench
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:18 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by TheNatural »

I think I have heard of the golden ball as being undefeated in the conference, not the actual trophy and title. I think some other leagues do it if I'm not mistaken.


favabeans
Varsity
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 4:45 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by favabeans »

SOC champs get the golden ball. All the same for volleyball, soccer and basketball.


coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5482
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by coop »

Wha do they call the trophy that has the gold basketball mounted on it....thats what Valley won...lol


transplant
SE
Posts: 2244
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:52 am

Re: Valley at South Webster?

Post by transplant »

lol, wow, its simple...the trophy is a golden ball...whatever sport it is, the ball is golden. there is not a special trophy for undefeated in the league or anything.


Post Reply

Return to “Boys Basketball”