SoutheasternOhioPreps.com

Who do you have as the winner???

I say Texas very close.

Colt has been there before and will be the difference.

Texas 24
Alabama 21

Roll Tide Roll!!

Alabama by 7


"They call Alabama the Crimson Tide.......Call me Deacon Blues" -- Steely Dan

I think the Tides defense will be the key to this game. Tide 28 to 7

avalanche wrote:I say Texas very close.

Colt has been there before and will be the difference.

Texas 24
Alabama 21

When was Colt McCoy in the National Championship?

Texas has played twice in Pasadena and both times have come in under dogs. The result is two wins and a national title.

I think Texas wins this one 31-20

Hokem Horns

He has been in the big game/national stage is what I am guessing he means.

If Alabama plays like they did in the Second half agianst Florida they will win by probably atleast 14. If not they they may only win by 3,2,or 1. Go Alabama

I believe Florida is better than Texas an Alabama beat them so I will have to say Alabama wins this one by 10pts. Texas has not faced a team like Alabama an Alabama has faced teams like Texas.

I'm sorry but IMHO texas doesn't deserve to be in the title game. Bama proved how good they are by beatin florida the way they did. Texas should have beat nebraska by a couple td's. I'm not sayin this because I'm a cincy fan but it should be bama and cincy in the title game. Sorry but that is just IMHO

Who has Cincy beat that makes them worthy? They should have lost just the same as Nebraska should have beaten Texas. Pitt actually trailed by 16 at one point to UC.

Nebraska has one of the best defenses in the Big 12, Pitt is an overrated over hyped big

SOS ratings has Texas at 31st and UC at 45th. Enough said.

[quote="Mad_Dogg"]I'm sorry but IMHO texas doesn't deserve to be in the title game. Bama proved how good they are by beatin florida the way they did. Texas should have beat nebraska by a couple td's. I'm not sayin this because I'm a cincy fan but it should be bama and cincy in the title game. Sorry but that is just IMHO[/quote

Couldn't agree with you more.... texas got lucky and play horrible against a team they should of easily beat, Cincinnati play a ranked and decent Pitt team on the road and came back from 21 points to win , Cincy played better against Pitt than what texas did against nebraska but we'll see when mark ingram runs all over Texas' and colt Mccoy won't be able to get anything going

Roll Tide

Bama runs away with it.

Bama has a solid Run defense, that took Florida's run game away and made Tebow pass to win.
Rhis, and ball control offense is what allowed Bama to win the title.

They are playing a totally different animal in Texas.

Plus, even though Cody is good, there is nobody on Bama's D-Line that will make the
impact that Suh did against Texas.

Plus, Texas is very good at run defense. They will be keying in on Ingram much the same way that Auburn did.

Don't get your opinions swayed too much by one game. After the Auburn game, people were doubting Bama very seriously,
now they look at them as a jugernaught.

I'm taking Texas by less than 10.

Bama-21
Texas-20

It's gonna be heck of a game

Alabama - 24
Texas - 13

Alabama by 10.

Texas is feeling the pressure of being undefeated, The Tide isn't.

Saban gets his second National championship.

Texas is feeling the pressure of being undefeated but Bama is not? Ok

What is the logic behind that?

Mack Brown is 2-0 in Pasadena and his team has won a National Title in the last 5 years.

3morethen2 wrote:

Couldn't agree with you more.... texas got lucky and play horrible against a team they should of easily beat, Cincinnati play a ranked and decent Pitt team on the road and came back from 21 points to win , Cincy played better against Pitt than what texas did against nebraska but we'll see when mark ingram runs all over Texas' and colt Mccoy won't be able to get anything going

Nebraska is a good team and btw a ranked team. They were 9-3, same record as Pitt. Pitt is overrated and over hyped. Pitt lost to an awful NC State team earlier in the season and I knew at that point they were nothing more then posers.

UC played Pitt only a few hours from Cincinnati, while Texas played at a neutral site. So UC giving up 44 means they played better. True their offense played better then Texas, but the Texas defense makes UC's look like a high school team. UC needed a screw up by the FG holder to get a win, otherwise they are going into overtime and who knows what happens.

I do not get a single part of your logic. Texas wins by a point and so does UC, yet UC played better despite trailing by 21 at one point??? No logic at all.