Page 1 of 1

ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:37 pm
by FANOSPORTS
Zanesville had a 48-43 lead with 1:00 to go and lost 51-50. It looks like no team south of I-70 will win a title unless Moeller can do it in D1 and that's very doubtful. Dayton Dunbar beat Cleveland Benedictine tonight in the earlier DII game 69-62 and they'll probably kill Port Clinton who's never even been past District's till this year.

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:28 pm
by TribeManiac10
Moeller has a shot, they definately have Mentor in the size department.

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:41 pm
by dimedrop4
Mentor is one thing. On the other hand, nobody will beat Gahanna Lincoln. Just sayin. :lol:

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:46 pm
by TribeManiac10
dimedrop4 wrote:Mentor is one thing. On the other hand, nobody will beat Gahanna Lincoln. Just sayin. :lol:

Yeh, I dont like their odds against the team that rolled over the #1 team in the nation. But its possible....much stranger things have happened in some choice basketball tournys this season.

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:42 am
by The Wizard
FANOSPORTS wrote:Zanesville had a 48-43 lead with 1:00 to go and lost 51-50. It looks like no team south of I-70 will win a title unless Moeller can do it in D1 and that's very doubtful. Dayton Dunbar beat Cleveland Benedictine tonight in the earlier DII game 69-62 and they'll probably kill Port Clinton who's never even been past District's till this year.


Isn't Dayton south of I-70??

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:57 am
by zbd
Just want to say GREAT JOB BLUE it was fun while it lasted!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:54 am
by earp
Dont ever underestimate Big Moe!They are tough out any year!

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:48 pm
by TribeManiac10
earp wrote:Dont ever underestimate Big Moe!They are tough out any year!

Yeh they have a longer history of success than Gahanna and are much larger in the post, but then again...so was Northland.

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:18 pm
by tropical breeze
Gahanna is one of the athletic teams I've seen in a while. That said, I didn't see them play Northland. Quick and very aggressive and 6'3" and 6'4" kids jump out of the gym. They should be favored, but heck anything can happen in a one and done.

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:23 pm
by TribeManiac10
tropical breeze wrote:Gahanna is one of the athletic teams I've seen in a while. That said, I didn't see them play Northland. Quick and very aggressive and 6'3" and 6'4" kids jump out of the gym. They should be favored, but heck anything can happen in a one and done.

Gahanna is the favorite in this one but if Moeller can get Griffin Mckenzie involved in the post they could make it very interesting.

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:34 am
by dimedrop4
Looks like I was wrong. Gahanna Lincoln went down last night in defeat 62-50. The mighty have fallen once again!

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:21 pm
by Philos_Finest
Massilon Jackson was by far the best team up there & they showed that against Moeller. Jackson's two bigs are going to Kent State & Akron.

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:21 pm
by sparky
i am glad some of you guys aren't fortune tellers. that is why they play the games on the court and not on paper. ask all of the number one seeds in the ncaa. go baylor.

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:25 pm
by TribeManiac10
Philos_Finest wrote:Massilon Jackson was by far the best team up there & they showed that against Moeller. Jackson's two bigs are going to Kent State & Akron.

I wish Northland and them would have met up. I dont think the Vikings would have had as many problems in the post as Lincoln and Moeller did. IMO Griffin McKenzie and company did not show up against the polar bears and the big rebounding differential shows that. Sullinger/Weatherspoon/Robinson vs. Henninger/Egner would have been a better show.