Napkin Stats from Saturday Games 11/29 ...

[pfloyd]

Portsmouth West 57
Warren 37 a final

Pfloyd's official "UN-official" Napkin Stats - Warren

Scoring ... Hudson Elzey 10, Blake Grimes 9, Shawn Adams 6, Caleb Tullius 4, Jaxon Venham 3, Jackson Perdue 3, Ryder Gorham 2
3 Pointers ... 3/15 … Hudson Elzey 2, Jackson Perdue 1
FTs ... 6/12
TOs ... 25
PnP ... 9 fgs/ 18 points in the paint
PnT ... 5 fgs/ 10 points in transition
Pbk ... 0 fgs/ 0 points on putback buckets

Pfloyd's official "UN-official" Napkin Stats - Portsmouth West


Scoring ... Will Kegley 28,Logan McIntire 15, Braden Adkins 5, Cristian Quirasco 3, Corbin Miller 3, Bentley Doles 3
3 Pointers ... 6/15 ... Logan McIntire 3, Braden Adkins 1, Will Kegley 1, Bentley Doles 1
FTs ... 15/21
TOs ... 17
PnP ... 10 fgs/ 20 points in the paint
PnT ... 4 fgs/8 points in transition
Pbk ... 0 points on putback buckets

[hoopsnut1979]

Pfloyd did you get to take this one in, in person or from a stream? Surprising margin. Interested to hear your thoughts on this one, and on Portsmouth West. I'm assuming you mean Logan Wolfenbarker instead of Logan McIntire for Portsmouth West.

[pfloyd]

Pfloyd did you get to take this one in, in person or from a stream? Surprising margin. Interested to hear your thoughts on this one, and on Portsmouth West. I'm assuming you mean Logan Wolfenbarker instead of Logan McIntire for Portsmouth West.

I too know him as Logan Wolfenbarker BUT on the program roster sheet it has Logan McIntire - I had talked to Coach Maddox about the West 1-3-1 and the length both Kegley and (during the conversation I talked about Wolfenbarker… Coach must have thought I was stupid since there was no Wolfenbarker on the roster lol) Wolfenbarker/McIntire bring to those perimeter traps and problems they would cause for the youngsters that Warren has on the floor … and those problems showed … 25 turnovers … Warren did not get at least 25 shots on goal while West has one of the best transition finishers around in the 6-3 Kegley … the on ball pressure by West along with no real post game by Warren … doesn’t /didn’t end well for the Warriors… West IS that 8-3 team that started out last season’s first 11 games WITH Wolfenbarker … now they have McIntire/Wolfenbarker for all 22+ games in 2025-26 … I have West in the top 15 for a reason - they are a good TEAM at both ends of the floor … if it’s McIntire on the roster sheet … it will be McIntire on my napkin stat sheets as well lol …

[jcbigblue13]

Pfloyd did you get to take this one in, in person or from a stream? Surprising margin. Interested to hear your thoughts on this one, and on Portsmouth West. I'm assuming you mean Logan Wolfenbarker instead of Logan McIntire for Portsmouth West.

I too know him as Logan Wolfenbarker BUT on the program roster sheet it has Logan McIntire - I had talked to Coach Maddox about the West 1-3-1 and the length both Kegley and (during the conversation I talked about Wolfenbarker… Coach must have thought I was stupid since there was no Wolfenbarker on the roster lol) Wolfenbarker/McIntire bring to those perimeter traps and problems they would cause for the youngsters that Warren has on the floor … and those problems showed … 25 turnovers … Warren did not get at least 25 shots on goal while West has one of the best transition finishers around in the 6-3 Kegley … the on ball pressure by West along with no real post game by Warren … doesn’t /didn’t end well for the Warriors… West IS that 8-3 team that started out last season’s first 11 games WITH Wolfenbarker … now they have McIntire/Wolfenbarker for all 22+ games in 2025-26 … I have West in the top 15 for a reason - they are a good TEAM at both ends of the floor … if it’s McIntire on the roster sheet … it will be McIntire on my napkin stat sheets as well lol …

It is indeed McIntire now ..he changed his name a few weeks ago....Kegley was an absolute beast up on top of that 1-3-1...very impressive performance from PW...they will win a ton of games...Warren took their learning lumps last night...will learn and get better

[pfloyd]

McIntire it is from this point on ...